Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Toronto

City takes fight over Toronto council cuts to Supreme Court

The city announced Friday that it has filed an application with Canadas highest court to seek leave to appeal the provinces decision to slash the size of council.

Province, city last faced off in court in June over mid-election move to chop council seats

Toronto Mayor John Tory looks at Ontario Premier Doug Ford as the two leaders spoke to the media last summer. Fordfirst announced his decisionto chop the number of Toronto wards partway through Toronto's election campaign. (Cole Burston/The Canadian Press)

The city announced Friday that it has filed an application with the country'shighest court to seek leave to appeal the province's decision to slash the size of council.

The city said in a news release that it is now awaiting the Supreme Court of Canada'sdecision on whether or not it will hear the appeal.

This movemarks the final legaloption for the city, after the provincial Court of Appeal decided in September that Premier Doug Ford's government had the "legitimate authority" to make mid-election council cuts.

Back in June, the province and the city of Toronto, as well as several candidates who hoped to run in last fall's election, faced off for a third time in court over Ford's surprise move to slash the number of council seats causing what city officials called "unprecedented disruption."

Ford has defended his move to shift froma47-ward system to 25 seatsaligned with provincial ridingsas necessary to fix a "bloated and inefficient" council.

In the 3-2 decision, the court of appeal judges said none of the city's arguments could "succeed," noting it was framed as an issue about protecting freedom of expression in an election when, in reality, the complaint was about the timing of the province's decision.

Changing the composition of a city council is "undeniably within the legitimate authority of the legislature," the decision read, since it's a "creature of provincial legislation."