Matter 'unresolved' after integrity commissioner closes social media case against Windsor mayor: complainant

Windsor's integrity commissioner has closed the case regarding Mayor DrewDilkens' social media practices but it's a matter which has yet to be resolved, according to Higher Limits CannabisLounge owner andcomplainantJonLiedtke.

In May, Liedtke said the Windsor mayor was in violation of council's code of conduct, for blocking him and others from the mayor's social media accounts.

But in a letter sent toLiedtkeby integrity commissioner BruceElmanover the weekend, it statesDilkenshas unblockedLiedtkefrom his Twitter account, prompting an 'appropriate informal settlement' of the complaint.

"As a general rule, Members of Council should not block or unfriend members of the public from social media platforms," saidElmanin the letter, adding there is no provision in the code of conduct which deals directly with blocking or unfriending others on social media.

Liedtkeis not acknowledging the case as being settled.He said it has little to do with being blocked by the mayor on a personal level. Rather, it's about answering the question: do elected officials have the ability to block their constituents on social media?

"This only raises far more questions primarily, what's the purpose of having a social media advisory bulletin issued by the integrity commissioner if it doesn't mean anything whatsoever?," Liedtke said.

"This is absolutely ridiculous. We live in a democracy here. The integrity commissioner is supposed to make rulings and, in this case, he has opted not to because the mayor had unblocked me."

Liedtke wants the integrity commissioner to make a more decisive ruling, saying Windsor is a city where elected officialsare allowed to block their constituents'with no outcome by a higher authority.'

"The integrity commissioner has refused to do his job. Why are we paying for this?"

Unsigned affidavit

The decision came one day after Windsor Mayor DrewDilkensinformed the integrity commissioner that the complaint had not been filed properly.

In a letter sent toElmandated June 28,Dilkensstates the complaint affidavit had not been signed byLiedtke.

"I am advised that an unsigned Affidavit is not Affidavit at all,"DIlkenssaid, adding his reasons for blockingLiedtkewas prompted by 'belligerent behaviour amounting to trolling.'

Liedtke calls the mayor's reasoning 'absolutely absurd.'

"I had it notarized by a paralegal ... You'll notice [in the letters] the integrity commissioner doesn't bring that point up whatsoever. Only Mayor Dilkens brings that point up so that has nothing to do with the decision whatsoever."

Suggesting a new solution

Liedtke said he wants to see the implementation of a by-law which directly addresses social media engagement. One method he suggests is to create separate social media accounts and email addresses not for each elected official, but for each position.

"At the end of the term, you hand over those passwords to the nextcouncillor who's coming in and you don't have the ability whatsoever to block constituents unless it gets to that matter of harassment or intimidation. That needs to be determined by an impartial panel."

Liedtke saidhe may resubmit the complaint to the integrity commissioner.