Nearly 2 in 3 UAW members reject Fiat Chrysler deal

Nearly two thirds of United Auto Workers at Fiat Chrysler voted to reject a proposed contract agreement with the company.

Sixty-five per cent of the membership voted against the pact, the union said Thursday, sending UAW leaders scrambling for a Plan B. Union leaders from across the nation were meeting Thursday in a Detroit suburb to talk about their next move.

The rejection is a slap at President Dennis Williams who pitched the deal as a fair way to compensate workers yet keep the company competitive in a global auto market.

The rejection by such a wide margin leaves open the possibility of a strike, since members seem to be unified in their opposition, said Kristin Dziczek, director of the labour and manufacturing group at the Center for Automotive Research, an industry think-tank .

"A strike puts pressure on all the parties to come back to the (bargaining) table," she said. "When you have this much anger and anxiety, I think a strike provides an outlet for some of that."

The vote likely will send Williams back to Fiat Chrysler to seek more, but it's unclear how temperamental CEO Sergio Marchionne will react, she said. Williams and Marchionne have a good relationship, but Dziczek is not sure how that will play into getting a better deal.

In a union statement, Williams said he doesn't consider the vote a setback because it's part of the contract process. "The ultimate decision and the power of the union is our members, and they make the final decision," he said.

Automaker disappointed by result

Fiat Chrysler said it was disappointed in the vote because bargainers for both sides worked hard on an agreement "that would adequately reward the commitment of our workforce while ensuring the company's continued success." FCA looks forward to continued bargaining, the statement said.

The union, which represents 40,000 workers at FCA, now can choose to go on strike, return to bargaining with the company to seek a better deal, or shift its talks to General Motors or Ford. Union workers at all three companies have stayed on the job under contract extensions since Sept. 14.

The union reached a tentative agreement with the company two weeks ago that includes pay raises, the potential for increased profit sharing and a $3,000 signing bonus. But some members objected because the raises don't bring an end to a two-tier wage structure in which workers hired after 2007 are paid less than veteran employees. The contract also allows the company to shift some car production to low-wage Mexico, replacing it with new trucks and SUVs that carry higher price tags to cover higher U.S. wages.

Workers said they voted "no" because the deal didn't give lower-tier workers a path to reaching the top wage of $28.50 per hour. They also said the contract doesn't cap the number of second-tier workers. The UAW agreed to allow lower pay for entry-level workers in 2007 when Detroit automakers were struggling financially. About 45 per cent of FCA's workers are paid the lower wage, while GM and Ford can't exceed 20 to 25 per cent.

Under the deal, pay for entry level-workers would rise 31 per cent to top out at $25.35 per hour after three years. Top-tier workers hired before 2007 would go from $28.50 per hour to $30 per hour during the four-year contract. They haven't had raises in more than a decade, although they have received profit-sharing checks.

Union workers made concessions in recent contracts to help struggling automakers return to health. But now all three are making money, and members want a bigger share.

But companies are fearful of raising their labour costs so that they're not competitive with foreign automakers that have U.S. factories.

"It's a tricky balance," said Kelley Blue Book Senior Analyst Karl Brauer. "An increase in UAW pay and benefits absolutely makes sense right now, but if the cost to automakers is too high it will likely drive domestic vehicle production outside the U.S., and it could set them up for financial risk."