What the daughter of Windsor long-term care resident thinks about new proposed legislation

The daughter of a man who lives in a Windsor, Ont., long-term care home says she is disappointed with the Ford government's proposed legislation for changes to the LTC system.

The Providing More Care, Protecting Seniors, and Building More Beds Act, 2021, would increase the power of long-term care home inspectors by allowing them to issue compliance orders on the spot. It would also allow the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Careto put in place a supervisor to run a home.

Joanne Lebert lives in Ottawa, but her father is in a Windsor care home. He tested positive for COVID-19 in January the day he was scheduled to get the vaccine.She didn't want to name the home because, she said, she doesn't take issue with that home specifically, but with the system in general.

"What they're proposing is what they should have been doing all along. But I think what is clearly lacking still is, you know, a lack of accountability for the way the crisis has been handled,"she said.

"We've seen long-term care facilities essentially not being held accountable for some of the most horrendous conditions for residents."

She said the rules aren't as much the issueas how effectively those rules are enforced, and that enforcement should include criminal charges for some of the worst offences.

"Theseare egregious, in my estimation, human rights violations and violations of the Bill of Rights that extend to criminal acts for repeat offenders," she said.

"And I think there needs to be serious consideration for criminal charges as well, not just penalties."

Mike Cardinal,founder and operator of Cardinal Place Smart Retirement Living, a licensed retirement home in Windsor, said this legislation doesn't affect people at his home because it isn't a long-term care facility.

But as an "interested observer," he did wonder if boards of for-profit LTC homes would be held accountable when things go wrong there.

"We are directly responsible for the care and for well-being, not only just the people that we look after, but also our staff. And these corporate boards have been more focused on the profits at the stock market kind of level than they are on the care of people," he said.

"I see in the legislation proposals to raise levels of fine and accountability for those board members,that's a really good step. I'm curious to see if it would ever be implemented. But that's a good step in the right direction."

Other changes proposed

Under the proposed legislation, maximum fines for provincial offences under the act wouldbe doubled:

• For individuals ($200,000 for first offence, $400,000 for second offence).
• For corporations ($500,000 for first offence, $1,000,000 for second offence).
• For board members (for-profit licensees: $200,000 for first offence, $400,000 for second offence; non-profit licensees: $4,000).

The bill would empower inspectors, not only directors, to issue compliance actions. Itwould allow the director of a home or the minister to suspend a licence and have a long-term care supervisor installed to take over the operation of a home without having to revoke a licence and close the home.

The bill would also prohibit any person convicted of an offence under the new act, or found guilty of professional misconduct detailedin regulations, from working for, volunteering for or sitting on the board of a licensee or LTChome.

"Don't you do due diligence on the people you employ, like you should have nobody with those type of backgrounds ever under any circumstance looking after some of the most vulnerable populations?" Lebert said.

She also said the workers at the homes shouldn't be blamed entirely for the faults of the system.

"I visit my father, and I see and talk to those people at the time, and they're really quite dedicated. And I think that goes hand in hand as well with more staff, more resources for staff. So that toohas to be addressed because everybody's working under pressure."

More from CBC Windsor: