Privacy, community trust, equity a concern after Windsor police access COVID-19 database

The Windsor Police Service's decision to access the provincialCOVID-19 database has experts saying it unfairly targets marginalizedand racialized communities, causes mistrust with localsand raises serious concerns around a person's privacy.

From April 17 up until July 20 when the province revoked police access to the trove of personal data Windsor police searched the database 1,841 times. Out of all the police forces in Ontario, Windsor Police rankedtenth on the list of police agencies that used the database during that period.

"It's very concerning," saidSukanya Pillay, a visiting professor and law foundation scholarat the University of Windsor who specializes in constitutional and human rights issues.

"Any time the police want to encroach uponour personal, identifying information, they have to have a constitutionally sound reason for doing so."

And Pillay, and others, don'tbelieve it meets thatcriteria.

"It undermines the confidentiality in the medical system, which undermines patient care," saidAbby Deshman, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association's (CCLA) director of the criminal justice program.

Names, addresses, dates of birth

The CCLAreleasedthe list, which it calls"alarming," after commencing legal action against the province for giving police this"unprecedented" access to names, addresses and dates of birth for those who tested positive for the novel coronavirus.

Ontario revoked police access to that database in July.

The Windsor Police Service declined an interview request by CBC News, instead providing an emailed statement saying its use of the database fell within the requirements and direction from the provincial government.

"Information in the portal was only accessed to assist in communicating COVID-19 status information to first responders strictly for the purpose of supporting [Windsor Police Service] personnel in making informed decisions about whether to take additional precautions to prevent the spread of COVID-19," wrote Sgt. Steve Betteridge.

Those additional precautions included more personal protective equipment as well as possible decontamination procedures, he added.

"It seems like a very inefficient way to keep first responders safe. We know that COVID-19 is highly contagious and people who are infected can appear asymptomatic," saidPillay. "There's really no rationalconnection whichwould be constitutionally required for police or other first responders to access this information."

In a sense you have people who are already overpoliced now being policed once more.- Sukanya Pillay, University of Windsor visiting law professor

Betteridge clarified in a subsequent email that "only authorized members of the WPS Emergency 9-1-1 Communications Centre had access to the database."

Legally permissible search falls in grey area, expert says

Kristen Thomasen, an assistant law professor at the University of Windsor, who specializes in privacy rights and data collection, said thaton the surface, Windsor police approachappears to be reasonable, adding that she fully supports officer safetybut said there are otherfactors at play. She called use of the database agrey area.

Race-based COVID-19 data isn't available or accessible in Windsor, but in TorontoBlack people and other people of colour make up 83 per cent of reported COVID-19 caseswhileonly making up half of the city'spopulation.

"As soon as you put it into context, I worry that we start to see the ways in which it's really problematic and can have a disproportionateeffect on some people compared to some other communities or individuals," said Thomasen.

"Which just factors into the bigger picture around the ways in which community trust is built, or affected, or negatively affected, possibly undermined by the use of different privacy-invasive technologies or conduct."

TheCCLAsent a letter to the Windsor Police Service and its board last month requesting that all COVID-19 information obtained from the provincial database be destroyed. The CCLA said it never received a response.

"Now we have concerns about what happened to that information," saidDeshman."Was it entered into local records? Has it been used in any way? Is it still accessible locally?"

The Windsor Police Service told CBC News information obtained through Ontario's COVID-19 database has been purged.

Marginalized communities could be affected by database search

Pillay said there's alsoconcern for people in marginalized or BIPOC communities who are sometimes overpoliced or have experienced discrimination at the hands of law enforcement.

"In a sense you have people are already overpoliced now being policed once more," saidPillay.

"When you inter-lay medical care and law enforcement, you end up pushing those communities in particular away from healthcare services," said Deshman, specifically referencingthe Black and Indigenous communities who have had distrust with police.

Durham Regional Police tops list

Other police forces in Ontario accessed the database in far greater numbers in comparison to Windsor. At the top of the list was theDurham Regional Police Service with more than 24,000 searches and the Thunder Bay Police Service with close to 15,000 documented inquiries.

The Chatham-Kent Police Service accessed the database 108 times, while the Sarnia Police Service did so 57 times and the LaSalle Police Service conducted searches 29 timesover the same period.

But some didn't access the COVID database at all, includingthe Toronto Police Service. A spokesperson wouldn't comment on why that police agency chose not to when they could have.

For Thomasen, she likens the issues raised around police services accessing the COVID-19 database to the Clearview AI controversy, as well as privacy concerns around allowing police to tap into homeowners' doorbell cameras.

"Potentially privacy invasive conduct that is being done with a justification that it's for the community benefit ... but without lookingat the big picture about how that actually impacts the community in a negative way," said Thomasen.