First Nations chiefs to debate Trudeau government's draft UNDRIP action plan

As the Trudeau Liberals approach eight years in power, David Lametti acknowledges much is riding on his government'supcoming plan to implement the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)in Canada.

The Liberals will paint a detailed picture of their current reconciliation agenda and chart a course for the federal bureaucracy for years when they release the finished document in June.

They'll likely get strong feedback this week from Assembly of First Nations (AFN) chiefs as they gather April 3-6in Ottawato scrutinize astill-incomplete draftofferinga wide-ranging bundle of 101 ongoing and proposed policy initiatives.

"A lot is riding on getting this right," said Lametti, federal minister of justice and attorney general, in a recent interview.

"It's walking and chewing gum and juggling and playing the saxophone at the same time. That's what we're trying to do with the action plan."

Under 2021's United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (Bill C-15 or UNDA), the federal government must align Canadian laws with the international declaration, a legally non-binding document outlining minimum standards for the recognition and protection of Indigenous rights.

Under that law, Ottawa has until June 2023to table the action plan, which Lametti said will lay out a "roadmap for how we go forward" but whichIndigenous leaders are not impressed with so far.

First Nations in B.C. watching closely

"What the federal UNDA action plan is very lean on is co-management," said Hugh Braker, a member of the political executive of the First Nations Summit, one of the largest First Nations organizations in British Columbia.

First Nations in the province are watching the federal approach with keen interest, said Braker, a lawyer and citizen of the Tseshaht First Nation.

He said B.C. First Nations are focused onco-management, meaning the affirmation of theirdecision-making power over things like fisheries, land and natural resources.

But Lametti wouldn't answer directly when asked if his plan will require Indigenous consent before resource extraction projects impacting them go forward.

"Indigenous peoples have to be involved in any project from day one," he said.

"If they are involved in any project from day one, I think it is a guarantee that only good projects will go forward."

A promise of involvement from "day one" isn't enough, Brakersaid.

"We're not talking about consultation," he said.

"We're talking about co-management, and we're talking about free, prior and informed consent."

'Consent is key,' says Archibald

AFN National Chief RoseAnne Archibald offered a similar take when she opened the gathering Monday afternoon, saying the meeting offers the chiefs a key opportunity to co-ordinate their response.

"Consent is key. Consultation is not enough," Archibald told a roomful of delegates at downtown Ottawa's Shaw convention centre.

"Colonial governments cannot decide on the future of our lands and waters."

On top of the UNDRIP plan, the AFN also must address roughly three dozen outstanding chiefs resolutions, through which the national organization receives its lobbying mandate, after the resolutions took a backseat duringpolitical turmoil last year.

The troubles included the regional chiefs' failed ouster of the national chief in July 2022 amid bullying and workplace misconduct allegations, which Archibald countered with claims of corruption and collusion, sparking a wave of ongoing probes and lawsuits that continue to play out.

Despite that, Archibald on Monday said thestruggles haven't distracted the AFN from its advocacy. She pointed to the Vatican's recent repudiation of the Doctrine of Discovery, a legal concept used to justify the seizure of Indigenous territories by European colonizers, as evidence of First Nations' international momentum.

"We have shattered the myth of Canada as a beacon for human rights," she said.

"After decades of shouting this, the world has finally heard our protest."

Indian Act 'must be repealed,' plan says

Among other things, the draft plan promises to establish an Indigenous rights ombudspersonand pursue amendments to fisheries legislation. It mentions ongoing proposed legal reforms concerning Indigenous health, policing and water.

It calls the Indian Act "a colonial-era law designed to exert control over the affairs of First Nations" that will never align with UNDRIP and therefore "must be repealed."

Russ Diabo, a First Nations policy analyst and one of the law's most vocal opponents,saidthe law "domesticates" UNDRIP, bringing the international declaration under a well-entrenched colonial legal system that includes Canada's Constitution andSupreme Court rulings.

"I see the action plan as a threat to our treaty and inherent rights," said Diabo, who is a contract adviser to the AFN national chief but offered the opinion on his own behalf.

"All the measures that they have in there are all based under Canada's assumed Crown sovereignty."

Lametti acknowledged much is at stake with the UNDRIP plan, but he said it's not a make-or-break moment.

"I don't like 'make or break' because it puts too much pressure on one person or one piece of legislation," he said.

"We have a number of different incremental steps."

These include jumps in spending on Indigenous programs, new Indigenous child-welfare and languagelaws, lifting of dozens of boil-water advisories, work to reform the land claims process and cut governance deals across the board, he said.

But the Liberals' reconciliation record has been under scrutiny, and this may well be a make-or-break moment for some observers, said Lynn Groulx, CEO at the Native Women's Association of Canada (NWAC), which advocates for Indigenous women nationally.

"I wouldn't be so confident if I was him," she said of Lametti.

"If we can't get this right, we're really in trouble."