Liberals present plan to phase out coal-powered electricity by 2030

The federal government is speeding up the plan to phase out coal-fired electricity by 2030 as part of its comprehensive plan to make Canada a leader in green energy.

But Nova Scotia has received an exemption to continue its use beyond that deadline under a so-called "equivalency agreement."

In announcing the plan today, federal Environment Minister Catherine McKenna said about 80 per cent of Canada's electricity currently comes from clean sources such as hydroelectric power, nuclear, wind and solar. The goal is to make 90 per cent of electric power generation free of greenhouse gas emissions by 2030.

"This will help build a more sustainable future, and it is also a great economic opportunity," she said during a news conference in Ottawa.

The plan accelerates the current timetable forthe four provinces that still burn coal for electricity Alberta, Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick to either capture carbon emissions, adopt technology or shut down the plants.

McKenna said the plan will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by five megatonnes a year, the equivalent of getting 1.3 million cars off the road, but she provided few details on how the accelerated phase-out will be achieved.

• Saskatchewan premier slams coal-power plan
• Do Canadians understand climate challenge?
• Suzuki on Trump and climate change

Reducing pollution from coal will also reduce smog-related illnesses, such asasthma, that affect children and seniors, McKenna said.

"The early phase-out will significantly improve the qualityof our air and the health of Canadians," she said.

The announcement comes in advance of a first ministersmeeting with the provinces in early December to hammer out a broader climate-change plan.

McKenna said the plan will be flexible to allow each province to craft its own solutions.

According to McKenna's office, the plan will:

• Ensure all traditional coal-fired units will be required to meet stringent performance standard of 420 tonnes of carbon dioxide per gigawatt hour by no later than 2030.
• Develop performance standards for new units to ensure they are built using efficient technology.
• Allow equivalency agreements with the provinces, which means federal regulationswould stand down and the provincial regime would apply if it delivers an equivalent environmental outcome.

More time for Nova Scotia

This afternoon McKenna joined Nova Scotia Premier StephenMcNeilto announce theprovince will phase in a cap-and-trade system to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Under an"equivalency agreement," Nova Scotia will have more time to phase out coal-fired electricity.

McNeilsaid the extension, which does not set a specific time frame,recognizes the province's past efforts to find alternatives tocoal-fired electricity and propel new projects such as hydroelectricity and wind power.

"This agreement allows us to use that time wisely to get us to a point where we can get off coal while at the same time not putting a sticker shock on power bills in this province," he said.

McKenna said the agreement also recognizes that this is "a period of transition" to position Canada as a leader in green energy.

"We recognize you have to be smart about this; that you have to find solutions that ensure people still have jobs, that we need to position for the future," she said.

Last month, Nova Scotia Environment MinisterMargaret Miller walked out early from a national meetingon carbon pricing in Montreal, just hours afterPrime Minister JustinTrudeauissued an ultimatum to provincesto adopt carbon pricing, or have it imposed, by 2018.

Miller and colleagues from Saskatchewan and Newfoundland and Labradorleft themeeting with McKennabefore a planned photo opportunity and news conference.

Although Nova Scotia appears to have worked out its differences with the federal government,an angry Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall said today's announcement marks the second time Ottawa has made a major policy announcement in advance of next month's climate change meeting.

He said that violates the spirit of a promised partnership approach.

'Disingenuous' collaboration commitment

"These actions have severely undermined the December meeting and have exposed the prime minister's disingenuous commitment to federal-provincial collaboration," Wall said in a statement.

He said Saskatchewan will evaluate the environmental and economic impact of the announcement on the province, butwill continue to "strongly oppose" any attempt to impose a federal carbon tax. Saskatchewan will not support any agreement at the December meeting unless the proposed federal carbon tax is withdrawn," he said.

Alberta Environment Minister Shannon Phillips said Saskatchewan's monopoly is much different from her province's deregulated electricity market. She said Alberta is well ahead of other jurisdictions in phasing out coal, which costs the province $300 million a year in related health-care costs.

"We don't expect this will change much for us because we've already set the parameters of our policy," she said.

McKenna's coal phase-out announcement came just two hours before a group of 15 health and environmental groups were scheduled to hold a news conference on a report called Out with the Coal, In with the Newthat outlines the benefits of an accelerated phase-out of coal-fired power.

Its analysis says the 2030 phase-out will morethan double the benefits compared with the existing 2012 federal regulation. The report a joint effort from groups including the Pembina Institute, David Suzuki Foundation and Canadian Public Health Association says the acceleration will avoid 1,008 premature deaths, 871 emergency room visits, and other health-care and lower-productivity costs pegged atnearly $5 billion between 2015 and 2035.

Schedule, targets required

Erin Flanagan, federal policy director for the Pembina Institute, welcomed the federal announcement but said it must be accompanied by a regulatory framework and a schedule of targets to measure progress.

"The transition to clean energy and away from fossil fuels is a clear requirement for long-term climate success," she said.

Ian Culbert, executive director of the Canadian Public Health Association, said "coal kills," and questioned why any province would resist a policy change that would reduce health-care costs.

"Any province that isn't interested in an accelerated coal phase-out really isn't interested in preserving the health of its citizens," he said.

There are now 34 coal plants in operation, according to the report. Another is located in Brandon, Man., but is designated by law as an emergency plant and is not in regular use.

Whilecoal-firedpower generation in Canada was reduced by halfbetween 2000 and 2014, coal is still burned to generate 11 per centof Canada's electricity. Itremains the primary source of electricity in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Nova Scotia.

Canada has maintainedsteady coal productioninrecent years, largely through exports, but a decrease in demandfrom countries such as China has halted production in some Canadian coal mines.

Canada's own consumption of coal has decreased dramatically over the past decade.

• BLOG: World leaders wade into water to fight climate change