CIDA document 'doctored,' Speaker rules

A scathing ruling by the Commons Speaker Peter Milliken confirms that a key government document signed by InternationalCo-operation Minister Bev Oda and two of her most senior officials was deliberately "doctored."

Milliken called the document tampering "very troubling."

"Any reasonable person confronted with what appears to have transpired would necessarily be extremely concerned, if not shocked," Milliken wrote in his decision.

Milliken said technicalities prevented him from doing anything further about the incident.

Nonetheless, the Speakers harshly worded ruling and Odas connection to a doctored document is certain to trigger opposition calls for the ministers head.

Liberal MP John McKay called the incident "morally reprehensible," and told CBC News he will be asking the prime minister to take immediate action against Oda.

He said the affair shows Odas management of her department has become "a gong show."

The original document in question was from Odas department, the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA).

It recommended the minister approve about $7 million in funding to a long-established faith-based foreign aid agency called KAIROS.

But sometime after the ministers two top officials had signed the document, someone inserted a hand-scrawled "NOT" into the recommendation.

The change made it appear the department was suggesting the government reject the funding request, which is ultimately what happened.

KAIROS funding cut

Without warning, KAIROS was simply informed it would be getting no money from CIDA, a cut that reportedly represented about 40 per centof the groups total funding.

The demise of funding for KAIROS ignited political controversy over whether Stephen Harpers government was systematically punishing aid groups that do not share its views.

Immigration Minister Jason Kenney fanned the flames when he subsequently claimed the government cut off KAIROS because of the groups criticisms of Israel on the Palestinian issue.

But Oda claimed in the Commons that KAIROS had lost its funding because the groups work no longer fit with CIDAs objectives, strongly suggesting she was acting on the recommendation of her department.

The ministers parliamentary secretary, Conservative MP Jim Abbott, couldnt have been more clear in the Commons:

"CIDA thoroughly analyzed KAIROS program proposal and determined, with regret, that it did not meet the agencys current priorities."

Abbott later apologized for unintentionally misleading Parliament.

'Profoundly disturbing questions'

In hisSpeakers ruling Thursday, Milliken acknowledged there are "profoundly disturbing questions that evidently remain unanswered."

The key one, of course, is who inserted the mysterious "NOT" into a signed document, and why.

Odas two top officials have confirmed the document they signed was a strong recommendation to fund KAIROS, a conglomerate of 11 churches that has been delivering foreign aid for more than 35 years.

The two bureaucrats, CIDA head Margaret Biggs and her vice-president, Naresh Singh, have denied altering the document, and say the hand-scrawled "NOT" did not appear on anything they signed.

Oda testified at a parliamentary committee in December that she didnt insert the mysterious "NOT" on the document, either, but agreed with the decision to cut off KAIROS.

Ina series of answers to questions from the committee, Oda said she had no idea who altered the document that carries her signature, which, she said, she may or may not have written.