Federal jobs distribution stable despite cuts, Clement says - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 11:29 AM | Calgary | -13.1°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Politics

Federal jobs distribution stable despite cuts, Clement says

The Harper government has released regional breakdowns that suggest the distribution of federal employment across Canada in 2015 will remain about the same as it was prior to the 2012 federal budget.

Roughly 40% of 19,200 positions eliminated based in National Capital Region

Treasury Board President Tony Clement's office has has released regional breakdowns that suggest the distribution of federal employment across Canada in 2015 will remain about the same as it was prior to the 2012 federal budget cuts. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

After months of refusing to disclose precisefigures, the Harper government has released regional breakdowns that suggest the distribution of federal employment across Canadain 2015 will remain about the same as it was prior to the 2012 federal budget.

Last spring, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty's budget speechannounced that 19,200 federal public service positions would be eliminated over the following three years.

On Wednesday, Treasury Board Tony Clement's office released a projected regional breakdown for the federal public service in 2015, in comparison with 2012. The variationsinmost regions are minimal:

Province/territory Prior to2012 As of March 2015
Source: Treasury Board Secretariat (Numbers may not add due to rounding.)
National Capital Region 32.4% 32.0%
British Columbia 10.2% 10.3%
Prairies 13.7% 14.0%
Atlantic provinces 12.4% 12.6%
Territories 0.6% 0.6%
Ontario 16.7% 16.7%
Quebec 13.0% 12.9%
Outside of Canada 0.9% 0.9%

The breakdown is not necessarily indicative of where jobs have been cut to date. Rather, it paints a picture of the planned distribution of federal employment across Canada once all the job reductions are finalized a process that's still underway.

Based on these breakdowns and figures released previously by the Treasury Board on the total size of the federal public service and the total numbers offederal employees across the country, it's now possible to projecta rangefor thetotalfederal job losses by region.

In the National Capital Region (Ottawa-Gatineau), the job losses are expected to fall within the 7,200-8,300 range. That represents roughly four in ten of the jobs cutaccording to theEconomic Action Plan outlined in the 2012 federal budget.

Outside of the capital, job reduction estimates by region include:

  • 1,400-1,700 jobs in B.C.
  • 1,100-1,800 jobs in the Prairies
  • approx. 3,200 jobs in Ontario
  • 2,700-3,000 jobs in Quebec
  • 1,300-1,900 jobs in Atlantic Canada
  • approx. 115 jobs in the Territories
  • 170-175 jobs outside Canada

"Leaner, more affordable government is good for taxpayers," a spokesman for Clement wrote CBC News.

Job cuts still rolling out

In the weeks and months that followed the 2012 federal budget,thousands of letters were sent to affected employees, some of whom found themselves forced into competitions to keep their jobs.

At the same time,a large wave of retirements and other voluntary departures rolled out across the federal workforce, further assisting the government in reducing its head count.

Clement reported last November that10,980 positions had been eliminatedso farmore than half way to the total announced in the budget. The positions were broken down by department but not by region at the time.

Clement's release last fall said that 7,500 positions were eliminated through attrition as people left voluntarily or by cutting vacant jobs.

Clement's release Wednesday adds that another 1,220 workers whose positions were eliminated have found new placements.

Staff reductions are expected to continue through to the 2015 target date for completing last spring's objective of 19,200 positions.

Last month, Parliamentary Budget Officer Kevin Page repeated his findings that last spring's budget cutswere havingadirect impact on programs and services,whileback office costs continue to rise, contradicting Flaherty's view that the budget cuts would target primarily administrative and support costs.

Clementhas suggested detailed breakdowns of exactly which departments would see reductions and wherewould not be available untilreports that are scheduled to come out later in the spring of 2013.