Opposition accuses Liberals of 'paralysis' in crackdown on crooked immigration consultants

Opposition MPs are accusing the Liberal government of failing to protect immigrants fromfraudsters and predators asit swings Canada's door open to more newcomers.

In a formal response to a sweeping study by MPs on the immigration committee tabled four months ago, Immigration Minister Ahmed Hussensaid the government is "seized" with issues related to inadequate protection from unprofessional or unethical practitioners, and conceded a strong system of oversightis essential.

But he did not commit to any of the committee's 21 recommendations, saying only that the government will carry out further study and expects to provide more information on a path forward next year.

"Given the complexity and inter-dependencies of the issues, the impact on public confidence, on clients and authorized immigration and citizenship consultants, the government will carefully consider the committee's report and undertake a thorough analysis of key recommendations before determining how these issues could be addressed successfully," his response reads.

A disappointed Conservative immigration critic Michelle Rempelsaid the response amounts to"typical inertia."

"There are very substantive proposals on the table on how to manage this, and the government really just needs to make a decision and implement it," she told CBC News."The fact they're not willing to do it suggests a sort of paralysis on their part, and that's to the detriment of people who are being exploited."

• MPs recommend new immigration consultant watchdog
• Liberals face pressure to crack down on crooked consultants
• Immigration consultant oversight body in turmoil

Rempel said it is even more critical that the government crack down on predators in thecontext of its aggressive immigrationstrategy.

"We tried self-governance. Clearly, that's failed," she said. "I'm willing to say the approach we tried failed, twice, and it's really now up to the Liberal government to do something, and thestatus quo is not going to cut it."

In the spring, theCommons immigration committee carried out weeks of hearings on unregistered representatives often called "ghost" or "crooked" consultants,hearing heart-wrenching stories from clients who were ripped off for thousands of dollars, orbrought to Canadawith the promise of work only to be dumped at the side of the road or left in a warehouse.

In all, the committeeheard from 50 witnesses and read 24 written submissions before submitting a unanimous report recommending a radical overhaul of how immigration consultants are regulated in Canada. It called for the disbanding of the existing council and the creation of anindependent, government-regulated body to oversee immigration consultants.

Committee's 21 recommendations

MPs on the panel also urged the government to raise awareness in foreign countries about unauthorized agents, and that Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada improve the call centre to providebasicinformation in languages most commonly used by prospective immigrants.

Other recommendationsincluded:

• The new regulatory body develop a system of tiered licensing forcategories of services individual consultants are allowed to provide.
• The new body should have investigative and disciplinary powers when an immigration consultant fails to meet standards of learning, professional competence or conduct,and also be encouraged to engage in public education about the profession and engage in dispute resolution over fees.
• The government should provide enoughfunding for Canada Border Services Agencyto investigate complaints about ghost consultants, and that fines and penalties be reviewed and increased.
• The government should provide more financial support to settlement agencies to provide basic immigration services.

'Very reasonable' response

Dory Jade, CEO of the Canadian Association of Professional Immigration Consultants, called Hussen's response"very reasonable." Hesaid it shows the government did not jump to conclusions based on witness testimonythat does not fully represent what is happening on the ground.

"My only concern was that the government would lay down a road map with timelines, whichI don't think they did and that is great," he said. "Because that will leave all options open for the minister and at the same time the stakeholders to put their input forward more adequately."

As part of his response, Hussen said until a plan is presented the government would expand outreach efforts to warn newcomers about potential exploitation.

But NDP immigration critic Jenny Kwan said the issue is of "utmost urgency" and it is unacceptable that the government's response isto delay action for further study. While the largerstructural changes could take time to implement, she said the government could implement "transitional" measures immediately, such as more funding for investigations and protections for complainants.

"There's no commitment that they willtake action or even any real acknowledgement of the significance of the problems," she said. "Atthe very minimum, ensure there are protectionsin place for people who are being hurt by these unscrupulous actors."

Many immigrants do not report abuse because they fear it will jeopardize their applications, Kwan said.