NATO is getting ready to twist Canada's arm on defence spending

As the old saying goes, there are some things one must never discuss in polite company. Politics and money usually top thelist.

If you've ever been to a NATO leaders'summit, you know thesegatheringsare the epitome of polite company (with the exception of Donald Trump).

NATO leaders at least in publicsometimes go far, far out of their way to avoid criticizing other leaders and nations, especially those who are perceived as not pulling their weight.

A military alliance looking to present a solid front to an uncertainoutside world hates any realor perceivedsigns of division.

• Have a question or something to say? Email: ask@cbc.ca or join us live in the comments now.

There was, however, one cringe-worthy moment at the 2019 NATO leaders'summit that's worth noting in the context of storm clouds building over this year's planned event in Vilnius, Lithuania. A bullish President Trump turned to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in full view of the cameras and after being questioned about the adequacy of Canada's defence spending and asked,"So, what is your number anyway?"

WATCH|NATO is a lot stronger now that Finland has joined the alliance, says Ambassador

NATO is a lot stronger now that Finland has joined the alliance, says Ambassador

1 year ago

Duration 8:07

"NATO is a lot stronger, because our armed forces are very strong. We have, of course, the capability to work under Arctic conditions and we are happy to share this knowledge also with our partners," says Finland's Ambassador to Canada Roy Eriksson after his country joined the defensive alliance this week.

He was asking how far off Canada was from achieving the alliance-driven benchmark of spending two per cent of national gross domestic product on defence. Members of the Canadian delegation accompanying Trudeau,seated to one side of the two leaders,began barking out numbers, some of them conflicting. (The consensus they landed on at the time was 1.39 per cent of GDP).

It was a made-for-TV moment that almost never happens at the kind of highly stage-managed summit NATO is used to presenting.

As he welcomed U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken along with the alliance's newest member, Finland, to this week's regular foreign ministers meeting, NATO Sec.Gen.Jens Stoltenberg casually rolleda verbal grenade across the floor when talking about the agenda.

"We will also address how to ensure that allies are investing enough in defence, and we will start preparations for the summit in Vilnius, where I expect allies to agree a more ambitious pledge, to regard 2 per cent of GDP for defence not as a ceiling but a floor, a minimum, that we should all meet," Stoltenberg said.

Canada has no plan to meet NATO's target

In late March, NATO published an annual report that shows Canada's defence spending amounted to just 1.29 per cent of GDP in fiscal 2022-2023.

It'snot much of a stretch to say Canada has no plan to meet that 2 per cent target. There wasn't one when the previous Conservative government signed on to the notion at the 2014 NATO leaders summit (when the goal was for allies to reach 2 per cent by 2024).

The Liberal government's 2017 defence policy tiptoed around the subject. Whenever they've been asked about it since, Trudeau and his ministers havebobbed and weaved and talked about what Canada delivers in terms of capability.

Their latest talking points are that Canada has the sixth largest defence budget in NATO and the country is among the top contributors to the alliance's $4.8 billion common fund,the budget that pays for the headquarters, joint operations and major construction investments.

The pressure on Canada to focus on funding the needs of its own military, as opposed to the overall alliance, is growingespecially since Russia's full-on invasion of Ukraine last year.

In a French-language speech delivered in Montreal last Tuesday, France's Ambassador to CanadaMichel Miraillettrumpeted his country's recent boost in military spending and proposals for deeper European military cooperation.

A 'weak defence effort'

He suggested Canada needs to demonstrate a similar commitment to global security.

"The same goes for Canada and its weak defence effort, nevertheless, somewhat forgetful of the memory of its past commitments, of the courage shown in all major conflicts, as in peacekeeping operations," Miraillet said in remarks quoted by The Canadian Press.

In an interview with the London bureau of CBC News this week, Foreign Affairs Minister MlanieJoly was asked point-blank about Stoltenberg's assertion that allies would soon consider the two per cent benchmark the floor, notthe ceiling.

She responded that Canada recognized the world changed with the war in Ukraine and that tensions in the Indo-Pacific mean"we need to make sure that we step up our game and that's what we'll do."

"Step up our game"may be a relative term, because Joly went on to say that the government is engaged "in a very important defence policy review, which is required before announcing any further investments."

That defence policy review was announced in the 2022 federal budget. Ayear later, shortly after presenting itslatest fiscal plan, the government announced there would be public consultations on how best to defend Canada in a more uncertain world.

The best-case scenario, according to several experts, is the defence policy being delivered next year and the necessary investmentsbeingmade at some indeterminate point in the future.

In fairness, the Liberals have committed to spending $19 billion on new fighter jets, starting in 2026. Theyhave agreed to put $4.9 billion toward modernizing continental defence through NORAD.

But ahead of President Joe Biden's recent visit to Ottawa, the Americans were expressing their impatience withCanada's habit of kicking defence expenditures down the road and publicly pressed for projects to be moved forward more swiftly.

The Liberal government's answer was to put a price tag on modernizing airfields and infrastructure to accommodate the new F-35s. The timeline for delivery, however, remained the same. The only project to hit the fast-track, according todefence experts, was an Arctic over-the-horizon radar station.

Two different government sources said the matter of meeting the two per cent defence spending target wasn't even raised when Biden and Trudeau met.

The Americans, it seems, have slipped back into polite company mode.

Asked this week on CBC's Power & Politics about Canada's defence spending, U.S. Sen. (D) Chris Coons politely deferred.

"I think that's a decision for Canada and the Canadian people to make, but I am satisfied that we have aclose partnership, an alliance, that we are making progress towards improving our security," he said.