Special forces actions in Afghanistan probed - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 03:53 PM | Calgary | -11.6°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Politics

Special forces actions in Afghanistan probed

Canada's Defence Department quietly began a major inquiry into the Afghanistan operations of the military's elite special forces unit two years ago, CBC News has learned.
Canadian soldiers conduct a patrol in southern Afghanistan in June 2009. Canada's Defence Department has been probing the actions of the military's elite special forces unit in Afghanistan, CBC News has learned. (Colin Perkel/Canadian Press)

Canada's Defence Departmentquietlybegan a major inquiry into the Afghanistan operations of the military's elite special forces unit two years ago, CBC News has learned.

The investigation began in 2008 after a member of the highly secretive task force, known as Joint Task Force 2 or JTF2,raised serious allegations against anothermember of the force and the force in general, the military has confirmed.

The allegations centred on events that took place between 2005 and 2008,said navy Capt. David Scanlon, but hewould provide no details about them.

Military briefing note

Read the2009 noteon Sand Trap written by Gen. Walter Natynczyk, Canada's chief of defence staff.

The investigation, called Sand Trap I, ended after a few months with no charges laid, but the probe sparked a larger investigation intobroader allegations. That investigation, called Sand Trap II, is still underway.

CBC News has learned the handling of detainees may have triggered the initial investigation, although the current probe is much wider than that.

The Sand Trap investigations should not taint the reputation of the military, Scanlon said.

"The Canadian Forces have been operating in the very complex Afghan theatre for almost a decade, and the vast majority of Canadian Forces personnel are performing their tough assignments with typical Canadian honesty and integrity," he said.

Briefing note to MacKay

A few details of the investigation are contained in a November 2009 military briefing note written by Gen. Walter Natynczyk, Canada's chief of defence staff, and obtained by the CBC through an Access to Information Act request.

In thenote, Natynczyktells Defence Minister Peter MacKay thata board of inquiry is investigating Sand Trap IIand started hearing from witnesses in May 2009. Military boards of inquiry are called to formally investigate accidents, misconduct or other major problems within the Canadian Forces.

News tips

If you have more information on this story, or other story idea, please contact investigations@cbc.ca.

At the time the note was written, Natynczyk wrote that 60 witnesses had testified before the board, and another 40 still needed to give testimony. He expected testimony to be complete by December 2009, with a report submitted by April 2010.

Scanlon said the board of inquiry isfocusing on the broader administrative and non-criminal aspects of the allegations at the heart of Sand Trap II.

He said investigators are receiving full co-operation from the special forces unit, andanychargesthat might arise would be be made public.

High-risk operations

The militaryhas neversaid muchabout the work of JTF2, although it has revealed the unithas been involved in high-risk operations against high-value targets, including Taliban and al-Qaeda commanders.

The unithas also been involved in pursuing insurgents who build and plant roadside bombs, and the networks that supply them, the military has said.

During the three year period at the centre of the Sand Trap investigations, 2005 to 2008,the JTF2 unit was attached to an American special forces command based in Kandahar. JTF2 took its tactical direction from the Americans.

The Sand Trap investigationsare not part ofthe Military Police Complaints Commission (MPCC) public hearings into allegations that military police failed to investigate senior officers responsible for transfers allegedly involving a risk of torture.

"This is a distinct and broader investigation," Scalon said. "Far broader than anything the MPCC would look at."

With files from the CBC's James Cudmore