What we learned from Canada's top bureaucrat about the SNC-Lavalin affair
'There was no inappropriate pressure put on the minister at any time,' Michael Wernick told MPs
Privy Council ClerkMichael Wernick, Canada's top bureaucrat, testified before the Commons justice committee Thursday, saying he did not inappropriately pressure former justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould to cut a legal deal with the Quebec-based engineering firm SNC-Lavalin although he did warn her of the consequences of prosecuting the criminal charges.
More than any other government player said to be involved in this ballooning controversy, Wernick spoke in clear terms about what he saw happening inside the machinery of government as the federal Liberalsgrappled with the file.
In 2015, the Mounties laidcorruption and fraud charges against SNC-Lavalin over allegationsit used bribery to secure government contracts in Libya.
In an effort to avoid a criminal trial, SNC-Lavalin lobbied a cross-section of cabinet ministers,MPs, senators, senior bureaucrats and premiers, asking that some sort of remediation agreement be reached that would allow it to avoid a criminal conviction. A conviction would exclude the firm from bidding on future government contracts for up to 10 years which could financially cripple the company and threatenits continued viability.
Here are five things we learned from Wernick's testimony:
1. Wernicktakes aim at Globe story
Earlier this month, on Feb. 7, the Globe and Mail published the initial report that claimed Wilson-Raybouldwas pressuredto direct the Public Prosecution Service of Canada to sign a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) a legal tool resembling a plea deal with SNC-Lavalin.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his former principal secretary, Gerald Butts, have denied any wrongdoing.
Wernick said Thursday that he thought the Globe's reporting on the matter was inaccurate.
"I'm here to say to you that the Globe and Mail article contains errors, unfounded speculation and, in some cases, is simply defamatory," he said.
The article citing unnamed, anonymous sources said that Trudeau'ssenior aides attempted to press Wilson-Raybouldto intervene andthat exasperation with her lack of co-operation was one reason for shuffling her out of the high-profile justice portfolio to Veterans Affairs.
While there was much debate inside government about what should be done about the criminal allegations, Wernickrepeatedly denied Thursday the claim Trudeau, or officials in the PMO, exerted inappropriate pressure on Wilson-Raybould to cut the company some slack.
"We are discussing lawful advocacy that the minister take a lawful decision, which in the end she did not take," hetold the justicecommittee.
"What Canadians need to know is that, despite a massive government relations effort, meetings with MPs, staffers, leaders of the opposition, paid advertising, pressure put through two premiers of Quebec, they didn't get what they wanted. If it's a movie, it's a flop."
2. The September meeting
On Sept. 4, theprosecution service told SNC-Lavalin, in writing,that it would not negotiate a deferred prosecutionagreement (DPA) paving the way for a trial on the matter at a later date.
Wernick said that in a Sept. 17 meeting between Trudeau and Wilson-Raybould which the clerk said was principally called to attend to another matter before cabinet, namely the drafting of a new framework on Indigenous rights the SNC-Lavalin matter wasraised.
He corroborated the prime minister's account of the meeting.
As attorney general, Wilson-Raybould could overrule the prosecution service, directing it to negotiate an agreement with the company.
Trudeausaid Wilson-Raybould asked him that day if he planned to tell her what to do and he said he told her that any decision on the matter was hers alone to make.
The next day, on Sept. 18,SNC-Lavalin representatives met with Wernick. The clerk said he doesn't remember the substance of the conversation or whether the representatives told him that the public prosecution service had denied a request for a DPA.
On Feb. 12, a week after the Globe and Mail story broke,Wilson-Raybould resigned her cabinet position.Trudeau said he was surprised and disappointed that shequit cabinet, adding that if she felt undue pressure in her role as attorney general, she had a duty to report it to him.
3. Solicitor-client privilege doesn't apply: Wernick
Wilson-Raybouldhas so far refused to speak publicly about what transpiredon theSNC-Lavalinfile, saying only that solicitor-client privilegestemming fromher time as justice minister forbids her from commenting.
Wernicksaid Thursday that, while he's not a lawyer, he doesn't believe she should be constrained from telling her side of the story because solicitor-client privilegesimply doesn't apply in this case.
"My conclusion, as someone who spends a lot of time in governance... I do not see where the former attorney general was a solicitor," Wernick said.
"The prime minister said at every occasion verbally and in writing that she was the decider, so she was not giving legal advice to the prime minister. She was the decider the full and final decider."
Wernick addedthat the matter was never discussed in cabinet and thus, in his opinion,she is also not bound by cabinet confidentiality.
"There was never, never, never a cabinet conversation about the prosecution," he said.
4. Wernick warned Wilson-Raybould about the 'consequences'
Wernickrevealed Thursday that, in a Dec. 19 phone call withWilson-Raybould, he did warn of the consequences of not moving ahead with a DPA for SNC-Lavalin.
He saidhe told Wilson-Raybouldthat the prime minister and "a lot of her colleagues" were anxious about what they were hearing and reading in the business press articles warning that thecompany could close down or move if criminal proceedings went ahead.
"Part of my conversations ... was conveying context that there were a lot of people worried about what would happen, the consequences, not for her, the consequences for the workers and the communities and the suppliers," he said.
SNC-Lavalinis a major firm, a pillar of corporate Canada, and employs more than 9,000 people across the country, including 3,400 in Quebec, 3,000 in Ontario and just over 1,000 in B.C.
The company, which is publicly traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange, is widely held by Canadian shareholders, including many of the largest pension plans and mutual funds.
"There's pressure to get it right on every decision. To approve, to not approve, to act, to not act. I am quite sure the minister felt pressure to get it right," Wernick said.
"There was no inappropriatepressure put on the minister at any time."
In the end, he said, the matter may boil down to an interpretation of what constitutes 'pressure'.
"I can tell you with complete assurance that my view of those conversations is that they were within the boundaries of what's lawful and appropriate. I was informing the minister of context. She may have another view of the conversation, but that's something the ethics commissioner could sort out," he said.
5. Wilson-Raybould never wanted an Indigenous portfolio
WhileWilson-Raybould disagreed vehemently with Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Carolyn Bennett on how best topursue the implementation of a new Indigenous rights framework, she herself never wanted to hold any of the Indigenous cabinet positions, Wernick said.
"She played a very particular role in cabinet. She did not ever want to be the Indigenous affairs minister. She didn't want to be the Indigenous Services or [Crown-Indigenous Relations] minister, and be the Indian agent for her own people," he said.
With files from the CBC's Kathleen Harris, the Canadian Press
_(720p).jpg)
 OFFICIAL HD MUSIC VIDEO.jpg)
.jpg)
