Trudeau tour: Showing up matters, but ditching talking points would require real political courage
Voters deserve more substantive answers when they ask questions of politicians
In the midst of questions about the export of military equipment, electoral reform, the treatment of veterans, the cost of pharmaceuticals and other matters, a middle-aged woman in Kingston, Ont., raised her hand, took the microphone and said she didn't have a question.
"Many of us are impatient for progress on issues that precede you," she said.
But for now she wanted to thank the prime minister for simply daring toshow up in the first place.
"It takes tremendous courage to come into a room where we were not screened," she said. "Nobody is reading you scripted questions and no one checked my background before I came here."
This would suggest an exceedingly low standard for courage in politics.
- Trudeau's'phase out'oilsandscomments spark outrage inAlta.
- Trudeauchallenged overcarbon pricing ontown hall tour
Trudeaugently pushed back.
ThatTrudeaumade it through two days in the publicrealm without ruining his political career might suggest this sort of thing is relatively easy.
If 80 per cent of life is showing up, thenTrudeauno doubt won some points this week by merely being present inKingston,Peterborough andLondon, Ont., and various points in between.
When you are being chased by concerns about $1,500-a-plate fundraising dinners and vacations on private islands, it makes obvious political sense to be seen communing with the general public.
Democratically, it seems a good idea thata prime minister should regularly submit himself to questions from citizens in an open forum.
But it might also be the least that should be expected.
Better still would be if such forums actually improved the discussion of policy beyond its typically dull and partisan standards. And, on that count, it'stoo early to celebrate.
One question aboutthe Aga Khan's helicopter
Only once wasTrudeauasked about his use of the Aga Khan's helicopterduring his Bahamian vacation. But that merely meant other topics mortgage regulations, the Confederation Bridge to Prince Edward Island, agriculture policy were given a moment or two.
Some of the questions he faced were less than withering (adorable children, it turns out, do not generally come ready to closely scrutinize the prime minister's record) and not many of the queries were sharply pointed.
I should probably just say thank you and move on, but I will point out that it's not as brave as it seems to do this.- Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
Butthe prime minister was still presented with several less-than-simple issues: the treatment of veterans, the costs associated with fighting climate change, the development of oil resources, deficit spending andthe small matter of Donald Trump.
His government is still new enough that he can respond with a vow to keep working on a stated concernor simply restate his commitment to do something. The Liberals have also not yet implemented so much policy that they're particularly easy targets for complaint and blame the economy, for instance,is not yet obviously their fault.
But submitting himself to these forums now will at least make it noticeable if he becomes less willing to do so later.
Born into this
As the prime minister reminded that woman in Kingston, he'sbeen talking with members of the public since he was a child "being dragged across the country" by his father. He seems at ease in the company of strangers, picking questioners out of the crowd and then smiling slightly and nodding along as they say their piece.
Trudeauseems generally capable of getting through an hour of questions without saying anything unfortunate, though his comment about phasing out development of theoilsandswas an obvious wobble.
AsTrudeaualso noted, staying attuned to public sentiment is in a government's own interests.
And the public seemed interested in their own right. Crowds lined up to see him and anxious hands shot up every time the floor was opened for questions.
If the reception was also generally genial, the forums were all hosted in Liberal ridings in Ontario. A tour of rural Alberta might go differently.
How well do politicians talk?
In addition to the decisions a legislator or cabinet minister must take, a politician's basic job is to listen and talk and they generally don't lack for opportunities to do the latter.
How well they perform that function is debatable. Modern political rhetoric is generally based on simplicity and repetition: therestating of short generalizations in order to drive one's "message" to a distracted public, control the story and avoid unnecessary controversies.
All of that is understandable. But regular public forums might push the discussion beyond the patter. Politicians owe members of the public more deference than an opposition politician or a journalist. So why not take the opportunity to more fully engage with concerns and questions?
The prime minister is exceedingly capable of delivering his preferred message quickly rounding on questions with familiar statements and assurances. There can be substance within those responses, but he can glide over matters of policy as opposed to diving in.
- Trudeau's'phase out'oilsandscomments spark outrage inAlta.
- Trudeauchallenged overcarbon pricing ontown hall tour
The specifics of aquestionabout phasing out subsidies for the fossil fuel industry were ignored. A complaint about the federal deficit might have produced a discussion of the fiscal considerations rather than the restatement of the Liberal platform that the prime minister offered.
Trudeauhas a defence of his decision to price carbon, but he doesn't quite explain why such a policy makes sense. He could likely go further in explaining why it makes sense to continue developing theoilsands.
In time, the novelty of these forums should wear off. If such events become more routine, the ideal result might be a fuller debate.
_(720p).jpg)
 OFFICIAL HD MUSIC VIDEO.jpg)
.jpg)
