Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Science

NASA finally launches Artemis mission to the moon

It was a nail-biter, but NASA finally got the first rocket in its Artemis mission off the ground. The rocket lifted off at 1:47 a.m. ET, lighting up the early morning sky in Cape Canaveral, Fla.

Leaks and hurricanes were just some of the challenges the space agency had faced

NASA successfully launches Artemis I moon rocket

2 years ago
Duration 2:00
NASA's Artemis I mission blasted off to the moon from Cape Canaveral, Fla. It's an uncrewed test mission but if successful, a Canadian astronaut will be on board for the next flight.

It was a nail-biter, but NASA finally got the first rocket in its Artemis mission off the ground.

The rocket lifted off at 1:47 a.m. ET, lighting up the early morning sky in Cape Canaveral, Fla.

"Today we got to witness the world's most powerful rocket take the Earth by its edges and shake the wicked out of it," Artemis mission manager Mike Sarafinsaidin a post-launch briefing. "And it was quite a sight."

But it wasn't without its problems.

After a successful fuelling of liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen in itsmain rocket which encountered issues in its first launch attempt back in August and early September it once again encountered an issue with its liquid hydrogen, this time in its second stage, called the Interim Cryogenic Propulsion System.

NASA had previously encountered a liquid hydrogen leak during its first two launch attempts. Itfixed the initial issue for this launch attempt. However, during the propellant load of its second stage which takes the Orion capsule destined for the moon into its desired orbit another leak was detected.

A crew was sent to the pad a perilous job with a rocket loaded with fuel to fix the issue, which worked.

But once again, there was another issue. This time with an ethernet cable fromthe range,which monitors safety in and around the launch area. But they eventually fixed that, too.

The Space Launch System the rocket itself is the space agency's most powerful rocket ever built. Atop it sits the Orion spacecraft, which will one day ferry astronauts to and from the moon. The last time humans were on the moon was in December 1972.

Though the rocket performed, it's only the start of the mission: Orion successfully completed its translunar injection, which puts iton its path to the moon. Now, the 26-day mission begins,which will test multiple systems, including most importantly, a new heat shield that is designed to protect astronauts from heat as they re-enter the atmosphere at nearly 40,000 km/h.

This graphic shows the mission timeline for the uncrewed Artemis I mission. (NASA)

A history of problems

This is an uncrewed mission, with the only passengers being three mannequins on board that are part of a few experiments, including testing a vest that will protect astronauts from lethal space radiation.

Artemis II, set to launch in 2024, will carry four astronauts including a Canadian who will orbit the moon and return to Earth.

Artemis III, set to launch in 2025, will see humans once again on the surface of the moon.

But trying to get the Artemis mission up and going had been quite the challenge for NASA.

Originally, the rocket was supposed to launch on Aug. 29. However, the space agency encountered several issues that day, including a delay in loading the rocket's propellant due to stormy weather. Then the two types of propellants liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen weren't loading at acceptable rates. Finally, one of the four rocket engines failed to cool down as expected, and eventually crews ran out of time in the launch window and were forced to scrub the launch.

A second launch attempt on Sept. 3 was also scrubbed due to fuel loading issues and a hydrogen leak.

Then came the hurricanes.

First, it was Hurricane Ian that forced NASA to roll the rocket back to the Vehicle Assembly Building. The hurricane made landfall from the Gulf of Mexico on Sept. 28 as a Category 4 storm and, though it did not cause extensive damage at the Kennedy Space Center, the space agency wanted to inspect the pad and allow its workers time to take care of themselves, which further delayed the launch.

Then there was Hurricane Nicole, which made landfall on Nov. 10 just south of the Kennedy Space Center as a Category 1 storm. NASA had rolled the rocket back to the launch pad on Nov. 4 for a launch on Nov. 14. Once Nicole had developed, however, it was too late to roll the 32-storey rocket back to the safety of the assembly building, so the rocket remained on the pad during the storm, and the launch date was moved to Nov. 16.

The rocket did experience some issues from being left in the storm.

One was some tearing of some thin caulking that surrounds Orion, which essentially fills in the gaps in the thicker insulation and prevents any air circulation or heating. There was concern that if more of it were to break off during launch, it could damage the rocket, potentially catastrophically.

This image shows a close-up of the area where caulk on a seam between the Orion launch abort systems ogive and crew module adapter detached during Hurricane Nicole. (NASA)

Another concern was the tail service mast umbilical. This 10-metre tall structure lies near the bottom of the rocket and consists of several lines that feed propellant and electricity to the core stage of the rocket. Engineers were receiving "inconsistent" data, even though they had replaced one of the connectors earlier.

Ground crew can be seen at the base of NASA's massive Space Launch Systemrocket, inspecting the tail service mast umbilical, left. In a media teleconference on Sunday, Mike Sarafin, mission manager for Artemis, said the area did 'have a problem' after Hurricane Nicole struck Florida last week. (Don Hladiuk)

Despite these issues, in a media teleconference on Monday evening, mission managers said they were confident that they could still fly.

"There's no change in our plan to launch on the 16th," said Artemis mission manager Mike Sarafin. "In terms of the two issues that we reviewed I would say we're comfortable flying as is."

The reasoning is that, for the mast umbilical, there are redundant systems in place. As for the caulking, they reviewed it and believe that no more would break off, and even if it did, there would be a low chance it would be a catastrophic risk to the rocket.

Sarafin noted that the same caulking was used in flight for the original test flight of the Orion spacecraft, and they did not see any issues of it detaching.

However, in the post-launch briefing Wednesday morning, Sarafin did note that there was some detachment, though it did not affect the rocket.

When it comes to the possibility of yet another leak during the propellant load, Jeremy Parsons, exploration ground systems program deputy manager at the Kennedy Space Center, said they weren't concerned they will encounter the previous issues.

"We are more confident than we've ever been in our loading procedures," he said.

Overall, the feeling was positive at the space agency heading into the launch. Parsons had noted that the entire team has persevered through a lot trying to get Artemis to launch.

Sarafin agreed.

"Our time is coming, and we hope that is on Wednesday," Sarafin said. "But if Wednesday is not the right day, we will take that next hurdle, that next trial and persevere through that."

It turns out Wednesday was the day.