Why living in space may require more than new technology - Action News
Home WebMail Sunday, November 10, 2024, 07:48 PM | Calgary | 0.9°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Science

Why living in space may require more than new technology

Though technology has certainly brought living in space closer to becoming a reality, there is one ongoing challenge that stands in the way of conquering space: the human body.

From changing eyesight to an increased risk of cancer, human bodies face numerous challenges in space

While technology to get us to Mars may be rapidly improving, our bodies will face physical challenges living away from the protection of Earth. (Pat Rawlings/SAIC/NASA)

We see it in science fiction moviesall the time: humanssettling on Mars or venturing into the far reaches of space. Though technology has certainly brought the fiction closer to becoming reality,one ongoing challenge stands in the way of conquering space: the human body.

The human bodywasbuilt for life on Earth. Put us into space under microgravity and it reacts in unpleasant ways.

As they soar into space, many astronauts experience nausea and even vomitingnot exactly a stellar start. When they return, they can experience blurred vision, headaches, muscle atrophy, weak bones and possibly even lung cancer from galactic cosmic radiation the equivalent of 10 chest X-rays a day.

Increased cancer risk

Astronauts already face an increased risk of lung cancerdue to radiation exposure. A recent study predicts that the cancer risk forastronauts voyaging to Mars will double.

"The biggest change [while living on the space station] is exposure to radiation. So that is increased by 100-fold compared to what we are exposed to here on Earth," saidRaffiKuyumjian, flight surgeon for the Canadian Space Agency. He worked with ChrisHadfield, before, during and after his five-month stint on the International Space Station from December 2012 to May 2013.

"The radiation exposure beyond low-Earth orbit is even higher...it'll be in the order of 1,000 times higher."

Raffi Kuyumjian, a flight surgeon for the Canadian Space Agency who worked with Chris Hadfield, shown here, says the radiation exposure in space is about 1,000 higher than on Earth. (NASA)

While no astronauts who have lived aboard the space station have reported having cancer, it may still be too early to tell.

"This may be something that shows up 10 to 15 years in time, once we havea bit of time behind missions and astronauts have grown a little bit older,"Kuyumjian said.

NASA is looking at ways of creating better shielding to block out the radiation, but so far, there isno definitive fix.

'You feelhelpless'

If there's anyone who can tell you about the challenges of living in space, it's Scott Kelly. He spent 340 days in space together with Russian cosmonaut Mikhail Kornienko as part of the One-Year Mission to study the effects of long-duration spaceflight.

He was also part of NASA "Twin Study" that compared his physical changes to that of his former astronaut twin brother Mark, who remained on Earth.

Scott (left) and Mark (right) Kelly were part of NASA's Twin Study that compared the effects of long-term spaceflight on Scott to living on Earth as Mark did for the duration of the mission. (NASA)

In his new bookEndurance, he talks about his first few days back on Earth and how difficult it was for his body to readjust. His legs swelled. He had headaches. His skin burned.

But that wasn't the biggest challenge that came while orbiting 400 kilometres above Earth.

"The hardest part for me was dealing with this idea that if something happened to my family on Earth, I couldn't come home," Kelly told CBCNews.

"It's not the personal risk...it was this idea that you kinda feel helpless."

And he knows all about helplessness. In 2011, his sister-in-law, congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, was shot in Arizona.Kelly was aboard the International Space Station with two months left in his mission at the time.

Astronaut Scott Kelly in Toronto to talk about his new book 'Endurance'

7 years ago
Duration 3:02
Scott Kelly was in Toronto for a sit-down with Canadian astronaut Dr. Dave Williams at the Ontario Science Centre to talk about his time in space, what sparked his dream, and what's next for spaceflight. CBC Toronto's Mike Wise caught up with him ahead of his appearance.

Space flight surgeons and space agencies are acutely aware of the the psychological challenges space poses and that's just with an average of six months on a space station. If humans are to go to Mars, they'll likely be away from loved ones for nearly two yearsat the least.

"We're trying to look at how this will affect the isolation aspect," Kuyumjian said.

Then there's the lack of natural sunlight, which can affect moods.

NASA is in the midst of retrofitting the ISS with light bulbs that change in frequency, with the "day" light mimicking natural light, with less blue light that can disrupt circadian rhythms.Astronauts must also take vitamin D supplements.

Changing bodies

Another change that's been noted since about 2011 is changes to astronauts' eyesight. Some had to wear glasses after returning to Earth.

Doctors noticed that the back of the eye was flattened, as though there's extra pressure in the brain that changes the geometry of the eye and focal point.

I never even after 340 days felt completely normal.- Scott Kelly, NASA astronaut

Then there aremuscle atrophy and changes in bone structure that can accompany time in space.

Astronauts lose bone density and the very structure of their bones changes under microgravity.

Human bones have evolved to fight against gravity. As astronauts exercise in space (to combat muscle atrophy, or the wasting of muscle), bone can reform. But without gravity, there is no longer a need for them to form in the same manner as on Earth.

European Space Agency astronaut Samantha Cristoforetti exercises on the Advanced Resistive Exercise Device (ARED) in the Tranquility Node 3. This machine helps astronauts to combat muscle atrophy while in microgravity. (NASA)

That could lead to weaker bones and the inability to avoid fractures or heal quickly.

"The density itself isn't the only issue: it's the bone architecture," Kuyumjian said. "The fact that the bone architecture is disturbed and we're not getting that architecture back, that is probably lost for good."

Kelly said that the longer you spend in space the more accustomed you became to the various changes. But it never felt perfect.

"You always feel a little bit better the longer you're there, but I never even after 340 days felt completely normal," he said.

Living in space means scientists and doctors are going to have to work together to develop novel ways of protecting or fixing our fragile bodies. But Kelly is optimistic.

"If we want to go to Mars, we can do that," Kelly said.