Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Science

We know plastic bottles are choking our planet. So why are companies still selling them?

Three of the world's largest beverage companies announced this week they're investing $100 million to cut down on the use of new plastic and improve plastic bottle recycling. But if we all agree plastic bottles are a problem, why do companies still sell them?

More than 1 million plastic bottles are bought around the world per minute, 2017 report says

A worker sorts plastic bottles for recycling in Dong Xiao Kou village, on the outskirts of Beijing. (Fred Dufour/AFP/Getty Images)

The American Beverage Association announced on Tuesday that the world's leading beverage companies Coca-Cola, PepsiCo and Keurig Dr Pepper are investing $100 million to reduce the use of new plastic and improve plastic bottle recycling across the globe.

Plasticpackaging isscattered in every corner of our planet. It's been found in the Arctic andthe deepest parts of the Pacific Ocean,theMarianaTrench.

And while Canada is looking to ban somesingle-use plastics, such as bags, straws and cutlery, one of the most significant contributors to the problem remainsbeverage bottles.

A 2017 report by the U.K. newspaper the Guardian found that more than a million plastic bottles are purchased around the world per minute.

Just last week, a global brand auditby Break Free From Plasticnamed Coca-Cola the world's topplastic polluter.

So, given what we know about the problem,the real question is: Why do beverage companies still sellplastic bottles?

PET project

Our love affair with the plastic bottle started in the 1970s.

As early as 1929, there were glass bottle deposit programs in communitiesacross the U.S.Once you returned your bottle, you received money back. It was considered an incentive to reuse.

But in the 1960s, DuPont engineer Nathaniel Wyeth wondered why the soft drink industry wasn't using plastic for its drinks. He was told thatcarbonated beverages would cause plastic to explode.

The story goes that he bought a plastic bottle of detergent, cleaned it out and poured inginger ale. He left it in the fridge overnight. By morning, the container had swelled considerably.

Following his experiment, hebecame determined to create a strongertype of plastic.

After years of trial and error, he developed polyethylene terephthalate, or PET, which he patented in 1973.

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is in plastic bottles and other kinds of food packaging. (Trevor Pritchard/CBC)

The soft drink industry loved it. It weighed less than glass, so it wascheaper to ship, and it didn'trun the risk of breaking.

But there were opponents to PET.

In 1969, Coca-Cola commissioned a life-cycle analysis comparing it to glass. The study ran the gamut, looking at water pollution, emissions, energy expenditure and more.

The investigators later reproduced it for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 1974. Their conclusion was that no throwaway container would match or surpassthe10-trip returnable glass bottle "in the near future."

Coca-Cola went ahead with the new plastic bottles, anyway. The rest is history.

Inherent problems

Sara Wingstrand, new plastics economy project manager at the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, a U.K.-based environmental charity, says plastic bottles present the same problem as the rest of the plastic packaging system: There is no value in keeping themin circulation.

And since the vast majority of plastic bottles don't find their way into recycling bins, they just keeppiling up

"We don't value the plastic bottle," she said. "We don't keep it and nobody really wants it."

Creating a deposit system for plastic bottles could be one of the solutions, providedthe financial incentive isenough tomotivate people to return their bottles.

Bart Elmore, associate professor at Ohio State University's department of historyand author of Citizen Coke, said that back in the day, when pop cost five cents a bottle, the deposit was between one and two cents.

"That's like a 40 per cent mark-up," he said. "Of course you're going to bring back the containers. So we know it works."

While some are calling for a return to glass, that's an unlikely solution due to the increase in shipping costs that international beverage companies would have to swallow.

And recycling glass has its own challenges, Elmore said.

"Theissue is it's a lot of energy to heat it up to reclaim it, a lot more than aluminum, which is actually very efficient to recycle."

Bottled water

And then there's bottled water, which remains one the most ubiquitous and socially frowned upon of all plastic bottles.

"Part of taking a stand on bottled water, for me, is to point out the absurdity of how much money we are wasting on bottled water,"Elmore said. "Maybe the best way to a consumer's heart is to show them how piss-poor they're managing their pocketbook on this one."

In his book, Elmore worked out the calculations to comparepurchasing a bottle of water for $1.49 and getting it from the tap where he grew up, which was, ironically, in Fulton County, Ga., the birthplace of Coca-Cola. He determineda litre of bottled water cost 1,935 times more than drinking water from a tap.

Yet, despite the cost to consumers and the environment, the industry continues to thrive.

Water bottles and bits of Styrofoam lying in leaf litter.
Bottled water remains one the most ubiquitous kinds of plastic waste. (Jack Taylor/Getty Images)

Wingstrand believes that one of the keys to getting people to refrain from buying bottled water is to install more refill stations around cities, something that is already common on university campuses.

"There are a lot more initiatives around Europe to rapidly increase the amount of refill stations around cities, also around airports," she said.

The future

For now, the largest beverage company in the world is trying to reduce its packaging in a few ways.

In Latin America, for example, Coca-Cola Brazil invested roughly $425 million US in a returnable plastic bottle program. The consumer pays an indirect deposit (a fee built into the price)when buying the drink and then gets a discount on their next purchase when the bottle is returned. The bottles are then cleaned and reused.

The company says it's seen a 90 per cent return rate.

On Oct. 23, Coca-Cola also announced its new "packageless" drink technology in Canada. Customers can buy a reusable cup that has a radio-frequency identification (RFID)and is synced to the company'sFreestyle machines. The machines, which are already found in some movie theatres and restaurants across the country, allow a customerto pour a drinkinto the bottle and charge it to their account.

A Coca-Cola ValidFill machine. On October 23, the company announced a pilot project for these machines that will allow people to fill their own reusable bottles. (Coca-Cola)

Unilver, PepsiCo and Mars, Incorporated have also announced their own initiatives to reduce their useof new plastic.

And it's all because they're listening to consumers, experts say.

"It is becoming a major threat to their business, not doing anything about this,"Wingstrandsaid.

But Elmore believes more needs to be done about plastic waste across every level, from businesses to governments to consumers.

Consumers, in particular, need to loudly express their disapproval of the currentsystem, he said.

"We constructed itand we can dismantle it."