Climate change could have devastating impact on global fisheries

If climate change continues unchecked and the global temperature increases by more than the Paris agreement target of 1.5 C, it is certain to have a dire impact on fish catches, a new study has found.

Fishing is a major commercial industry and source of food for many people around the world, particularly in temperate regions. However, as more carbon dioxide is pumped into the atmosphere, it causes the temperature of the world's oceans to rise. This can create less-than-ideal conditions for fish and marine life.

Imagine: ifyou're inVancouver,you'regoingto see fish thatyou'venever seen before.- GabrielReygondeau, University of British Columbia

Instead of living in an unfriendly environment, the fish will start to migrate to the cooler waters near the poles.

This will leave temperate regions at the equator and up to 25 degrees latitude both north and south without the fish they so depend on.

The study, published in the journal Science, used a numerical model to calculate what would happen in a "business-as-usual" scenario where the planet continues to warm3.5 C above the average. What they found was a major disruption of marine life.

"For every degree Celsius warmer, there will be about three million tonnes of fish that we're losing from the ocean in terms of potential fisheries catches," lead author William Cheung, director of science at the Nippon Foundation-UBC Nereus Program and associate professor at UBC's Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries told CBC News.

And, as Canadians, we'll see the impacts as well.

"In Canada we're used to fishing cod, certain types of fish," saidGabrielReygondeau, who co-authored the paper. "With climate change, there will be a poleward migrationof all the fish. The fish of the tropics will go higher and higher in latitude to track down their optimal environment.Imagine: if you're in Vancouver, you'regoing to see fish that you've never seen before."

The effects of a warming ocean has already been seen, Reygondeau said.

"All the trends that we describe in our paper are trends that have already beenreported," he said.

Good news

However, instead of seeing it as bad news, the researchers have taken a positive approach: the Paris climate agreement is on the right track.

"What we show in this paper is all the benefits of reaching this 1.5 C target,"Reygondeausaid."The train has already left the station and is going faster and faster. The problem now is how much are we committed to not losing any more."

In order to prevent a large-scale loss of fish, it's important that all the countries particularly some of the largest emitters of carbon dioxide hold to the Paris agreement.

The main goal, Cheung said, was to highlight a very real consequence of climate change.

"Often agriculture is the main concern," Cheung said. "Fisheries are often not highlighted. But lots of coastal communities are dependant on marine fish. Some of the countries will be at riskof being malnourished if there's a substantial decrease in their fish supply.

"If one of these big, big countries does not respect the Paris a that will clearly, clearly affect the efforts of all the others."

The difference between a 1.5 C and 3.5 C warming is considerable. The study found that the Indo-Pacific region would see 40 per cent morein fisheries catches between1.5 C versus 3.5 C. That's the equivalentof about six million tonnes of fish annually.

The authors hope their findings will provide an incentive for countries to abide by the climate goals set out by the Paris agreement.

Reygondeausaid, "1.5degreesis a threshold. It's a threshold where it's still acceptable."

"Lots of countries, lots of regions are still going to lose a lot of catch, but it's still acceptable;1.5 degrees is a tipping point."

• Rudolph's summer grazing may help battle climate change