Oculus Rift is here: What the critics are saying

It's judgement day for virtualreality: Facebook-owned Oculus started to ship its first Rift VRheadsets to consumers this week. And while it may take a fewdays for consumers to make up their minds about the device,gadget reviewers from major newspapers and tech websites alreadychimed in on Monday.

Oculus founder Palmer Luckey hand-delivered the first Rift to software developer Ross Martin in Anchorage, Alaska, on Saturday, kicking off a new era in virtual reality by putting the most powerful VR device yet into a consumer's hands.

• Virtual reality: The difference between a $20 and $1,100 VR headset
• PlayStationVR to debut in October for $549
• Samsung'sGear VR is both virtual and real, though not without shortcomings

Martin, who had never tried VR before, spent a few hours on the Rift Monday morning. He watched a short movie, played a game and explored a virtual environment that included an up-close encounter with a Tyrannosaurus Rex.

"I couldn't stop saying, 'Wow,"' Martin, a 33-year-old web developer, said in an interview. But he said that he felt a touch of nausea at times and that the resolution could be better.

"If you're a gamer, this is right up your alley," he said. "You're going to be able to forgive that."

Oculus has said it's sending the Rift to its first Kickstarter backers first, followed by those who ordered one in January for $600 US, or at least $1,500 with a high-end personal computer included. Oculus, which began crowd-funding through Kickstarter in August 2012, was acquired by Facebook for $2 billion in 2014 and has shipped two developer versions so far.

Cautious optimism from critics

So what are the critics thinking about the Oculus Rift? Manyseem pleased by the device itself, praising the build qualityand optics, but underwhelmed by the first few games andexperiences.

Take the Wall Street Journal, for example, whose Geoffrey A.Fowler had this to say about the Rift: "Oculus Rift is the 2016product you hope your neighbor buys. You'll definitely want totry it, but there's little reason to own one unless you're aserious gamer."

That sentiment was echoed by Cnet, whose critic SeanHollister wrote: "You simply must try the Oculus Rift. It'sbreathtaking. I just wouldn't buy one right now and there'sno reason you should feel the need to, either."

The Verge's Adi Robertson seemed to be more upbeat about thedevice: "The Rift is something I'd be happy to have in my livingroom. (...) The headset you can buy today is not Oculus' mostambitious vision for virtual reality but it's a vision thatOculus has successfully delivered on."

And Wired's Peter Rubin praised the Rift hardware: "This isan astonishingly well-made device. It delivers rock-solid,comfortable VR, and it does so easily. You'll be able to putthis thing on anyone and show them the magic."

Rift launches with 30 titles, more coming soon

Other reviewers seemed more turned off by the currentexperience, including New York Times critic Brian X. Chen: "Thefirst batch of apps and games added up to a confusing,disjointed virtual reality landscape. In my tests, my reactionwas more often 'Why would I want to be here?'or 'Why is this invirtual reality?'rather than 'Wow.'"

The good news for Oculus is that many of the points thatcritics took issue with can be solved over time. The Riftlaunched with 30 titles, but many more are expected to beavailable in the coming months. Oculus also won't release itsTouch controllers until later this year, which will not onlyimprove the experience with existing games, but also enable awhole range of new games and experiences.

So the company may not have to be too concerned aboutreviews that suggest to wait a few months. After all, the Riftis currently sold out, and a new batch isn't expected to beavailable until July.