Is chocolate really good for you? UBC scientists make new tool to measure antioxidants - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 12:38 AM | Calgary | -11.5°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Science

Is chocolate really good for you? UBC scientists make new tool to measure antioxidants

Every chocolate lover wants the headlines about antioxidants in chocolate to be true. And for better or for worse, determining just how much of the disease-fighting molecules are contained in this popular treat may be getting a little easier with a new tool created by UBC researchers.

New, quicker method will help identify steps in manufacturing that cause antioxidants to drop

UBC food scientists Xiaonan Lu, left, and PhD candidate Yaxi Hu have developed a new method to identify the antioxidant levels in chocolate more quickly and easily. (Martin Dee/UBC)

Every chocolate lover wants the headlines about antioxidants in chocolate to be true.

For better or forworse, determining just how much of the disease-fighting molecules are contained in this popular treat may be getting a little easier.

Researchers from the University of British Columbia saya new tool they've made will help determine those antioxidant levels much more quickly and reliably than has been possible so far.

"Our method predicts the antioxidant levels in chocolate in under a minute, compared to the industry standard that can take several hours or even days," said Xiaonan Lu, an assistant professor at UBC'sfaculty of land and food systems.

Lu developed the system along with PhD candidate Yaxi Hu.

Their new system "can do a very rapid and reliable screening of a lot of samples in a short time period," Lu told CBC News.

Although antioxidant levels drop as cocoa beans are transformed into finished chocolate products, dark chocolate has higher levels than milk chocolate. (Gregory Bodnar/Flickr)

Antioxidant loss

Cocoa beans are rich in antioxidants, but the hitch is that the process to turntheminto chocolate bars diminishes those disease-fighting compounds.

"During the whole chocolate processing stage there will be a lot of loss during every single step for example, the fermentation, the drying so those will be the key parametersthat affect the final antioxidant levels in the chocolate," Lu said.

As most chocolate lovers know, milk chocolate has lower levels of antioxidants than dark because the percentage of cocoa beans islower when milk and other additivesare introduced.

But Lu said the new method of measuring antioxidants will help identify and refine the process of making chocolate, with the hope of adapting it to optimizeantioxidant levels.

"This is only the first step," said Lu. At this stage, the food scientists haveestablished a process for testing finished chocolate bars.

"But, starting from there, we're going to go to the raw cocoa beans and test for each step in the chocolate production, because we want to know which step is most critical for the antioxidant loss."

Funding chocolatier

While this research project is funded primarily by the federal government'sNatural Sciences and EngineeringResearch Council (NSERC)and the non-profit Mitacs, it was an inquiry and offer of funding from a Vancouver-area chocolatierthat got itunderway.

"The company is a small local company in West Vancouver," said Lu.

"The CEO of the company has a lot of interest to know the level and also the state of the antioxidants in the chocolate products, because they do the manufacturing of the chocolate from the beginning: from the harvesting of the raw cocoa beans to the final chocolate products.

Whether increasing antioxidants levels in something like chocolate really has any measurable clinical benefit I think is an open question.- TimothyCaulfield, University of Alberta

"And he really wanted to know how to control, how to maximally maintain the level of the antioxidants during the manufacturing.He's a big fan of the antioxidants, so I think that's the initial motivation."

Don't splurge yet

Timothy Caulfield, a professor at the University of Alberta's faculty of law and school of public health, studies how industry funding affectsscientific research. He told CBC News that industry money is"something we know has an impact on both the science and how the results are presented."

Although Caulfieldis a chocolate loverwho would be delighted to know the health benefits are real, he said that really hasn't been established yet.

"The whole concept behind antioxidants and whether increasing antioxidants levels in something like chocolate really has any measurable clinical benefit I think is an open question. And it's almost like it's being used as marketing strategy," he said.

Lu himself cautions that chocolate has to be approached in a balanced way. He said consumers and most food industry experts "totally agree that the digestion of antioxidants are very beneficial to consumers."

"But on the other hand there's a relatively high level of fat."

Really whatthey're trying to do is leverage perceptions of health and create a "health halo"around the product.- Timothy Caufield, University of Albert law professor

He also pointed out that Canada doesn't yet require companies to include the antioxidant levels on food packaging. "I know in some European countries they have this labelling of the antioxidant level in chocolate bars. That's not the situation in North America."

A 'health halo'

Speaking generally about chocolate marketing, Caulfield said "really whatthey're trying to do is leverage perceptions of health and create a 'health halo' around the product. That 'somehow because it has antioxidants I can eat more chocolate' which I'm all for, by the way."

In what could be considered another effort to put that halo on chocolate, this week Nestl scientists announced that the company had found a way to decrease the sugar in chocolate by as much as 40 per cent by hollowing out the sugar crystal to deliver sweetness in smaller amounts.

Caulfield said chocolate is "a really good example" ofconflicting data about health benefits of foods. "Chocolate's good for you, chocolate's bad for you, chocolate is neutral you hear all these conflicting stories."

The reality is that no one foodshould be crowned a so-called superfood, said Caulfield."I think it's all about eating a balanced diet, stuff that we've known for decades. We're talking lots of fruits and vegetables, whole grains, healthy proteins:there is no magic out there."

"But I think people are attracted to the idea that there is magic; that somehow eating lots of blueberries and healthy chocolate and just the right amount of green tea and all these kind of things are going to have some sort of transformative impact on our health, and it just really isn't the case."