Rare New York Times front-page editorial urging gun control draws praise, ire
Conservative blogger shows his anger over article by shooting bullets into it
The New York Times stunned readers Saturday, publishing a highly charged editorial on gun controlonits sought-afterfront page in the wake of the California shootings the first editorial to grace the paper'scover in 95 years.
The 446-word piece, titled "The Gun Epidemic,"basheselected leaders for rejecting restrictions on guns and for failing to keepAmericans safe.
- Republicans, Democrats criticized over San Bernardino prayers and gun reform
- Gun sales to people on FBI terrorist watchlist must be blocked, Obama says
Elected leaders "place a higher premium on the money and political power of an industry dedicated to profiting from the unfettered spread of ever more powerful firearms," it reads.
"It is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency."
The editorialcalls for greater gun regulation anda drastic reduction in the number of available firearms, with hopes of "eliminating some large categories of weapons and ammunition."
The front page of The New York Times for Saturday, Dec. 5. pic.twitter.com/XsyKGA4Vrk
—@nytimes
Republicans andDemocrats alike have been criticized this week fortheirprayers forthe victims of theSan Bernardinoshootings. Many haveaccusedthem of hypocrisy given their stance ongun control legislation.
Arthur Sulzberger Jr., the Times' publisher, posted a brief message online explaining the reasonforeditorial.
"We [are publishing this]today to delivera strong and visible statementof frustration and anguish about our country's inability to come to terms with the scourge of guns," he said.
"Even in this digital age, the front page remains an incredibly strong and powerful way to surface issues that demand attention."
The last time the newspaper ran an editorial on the front page was in June 1920, in response to the Republican presidentialnomination of Warren G. Harding, who went on to win the election later that year and become president.
The unusually-placededitorialgota lot of people talking.
Some tweeted their support:
The NYT front page editorial on guns is both brilliant and tragic https://t.co/oF3TQixLN9
—@HadleyFreeman
Front page NYT Brilliant. End the Gun Epidemic in America, via @nytimes #guncontrol #gunsense https://t.co/1qRL9dXuN8
—@gorenrocks
Others were critical, questioning its relevance and impact.
Republican presidential candidate and New Jersey Gov.Chris Christie told CBS News that the editorial was "typical liberal claptrap from the New York Times." Instead, he suggested that moreshould be done toinstitutionalize the mentally ill.
Fellow Republican candidateDonald Trump was alsoasked by reportersabout the editorial, replying thatthe victims of the California and Paris shootings"couldhave protected themselves if they had had guns."
So basically the NYT is more concerned about #guncontrol than it is about #BorderControl or terrorist control. #NewYorkTimes #SanBernadino ="https:>
—@lawyermatt
I can detect nothing resembling a rational argument in the vapid and poorly written NYT gun control editorial. Wasted space.
—@SusanBaumann
Some took their frustrations even further.
Conservative blogger Erick Erickson says he shot bullets through a copy of Saturday's editorial to show his anger.
I shot holes in the NY Times editorial - This is what I think of the New York Times edito... https://t.co/XEJpuV05Kk pic.twitter.com/brh3KrODwS
—@EWErickson
Erickson posted a photo of what he said was his bullet-riddled copy of the Times online, along with an accompanying post explaining why he did it.
"The United States suffered its worst terrorist attacks since September 11and the New York Times's response is that all law-abiding citizens need their guns taken away. Screw them," he wrote in a blog post.
"This is what I think of the New York Times editorial today."
He encouraged others to shoot bullet holes through the editorial and post their results online. Ericksondidnot saywhat he shot the editorialwith, but he posted photos he took at a gun range earlier on Saturday to his social media accounts.
Hisactions were subsequently mocked on Twitter.
Some made fun of his aim, which prompted a further response from Erickson.
"I wanted to shoot it from top to bottom. I only had seven bullets and made the most of it."
Turns out the holes I just shot in Erick Erickson's tweet have a better grouping. Wuss. pic.twitter.com/I9EshKwyGZ
—@HCookAustin
In solidarity with @EWErickson, I also shot the New York Times editorial. But I only have an online subscription. pic.twitter.com/h2hOU2Znw1
—@adamsteinbaugh
.@EWErickson OH YEAH WELL I PUNCHED YOUR TWEET pic.twitter.com/xZHxUI2nJJ
—@alecowen
.@EWErickson Hey @washingtonpost, I sword-attacked your comics section. THAT'S what I think of today's Garfield... pic.twitter.com/PZugIFH9pg
—@CarlBeijer
With files from Reuters