'I stand by what I told Rolling Stone': Woman who alleged rape testifies at trial - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 03:58 AM | Calgary | -11.7°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
World

'I stand by what I told Rolling Stone': Woman who alleged rape testifies at trial

The subject of a Rolling Stone article on a gang rape at the University of Virginia that the magazine retracted after investigators found no evidence the attack occurred, testified on Monday she believed she had told the reporter the truth.

University administrator is suing Rolling Stone for defamation over controversial article

The Phi Kappa Psi fraternity house is seen on the University of Virginia campus on December 6, 2014 in Charlottesville, Va. The controversial Rolling Stone article portrayed incidents of sexual assault allegedly committed by the fraternity. (Jay Paul/Getty Images)

The subject of a Rolling Stone article on a gang rape at the University of Virginia that the magazine retracted after investigators found no evidence the attack occurred, testified on Monday she believed she had told the reporter the truth.

The woman, identified only as Jackie, gave a videotaped deposition for a civil lawsuit filed by a former associate dean of students at the school who has sued Rolling Stone for $7.9 million US, claiming defamation.

"I stand by what I told Rolling Stone. I believed it to be true at the time," the woman said in a recording played to the jury at U.S. District Court in Charlottesville on Monday.

When pushed by attorneys to provide specific details, she responded: "I have PTSD [post-traumatic stress disorder]. I don't remember a lot of what happened at that time."

The 2014 article, A Rape on Campus, prompted a national debate about sexual assaults on college campuses and the role of fraternities. But subsequent investigations by police and the magazine determined the attack depicted never took place, and Rolling Stone withdrew the article.

Nicole Eramo, centre, leaves the federal courthouse on Oct. 19., in Charlottesville, Va.. Eramo, a University of Virginia administrator who sued Rolling Stone magazine over its portrayal of her in a now-discredited story about an alleged gang rape. (Ryan M. Kelly/The Daily Progress via AP)

The plaintiff, Nicole Eramo, contends the article painted her as a villain and has hurt her employment prospects. She now works in an administrative role at the school.

The trial will hinge on whether Rolling Stone believed Jackie's story when it published the article.

Malice must be proved

Jackie testified she had been uncomfortable about the article, but added: "I felt overwhelmed and stressed and scared. I was getting pressure from a lot of people to do something."

She testified that when she first spoke with reporter Sabrina Rubin Erdely, she thought the article was going to be about survivor support for sexual assault victims on college campuses.

Journalist Sabrina Erdely, centre, came under fire for not seeking out the alleged attackers for comment, as well as other fact-checking errors in the Rolling Stone article. (Ryan M. Kelly/The Daily Progress via AP)

Instead, the focal point of the article became her own account of being raped by seven men at a fraternity party in 2012, when she was a freshman.

She said she was under the impression the details of her story were never going to be published.

Rolling Stone said in a statement that testimony by Jackie and others showed that neither Erdely nor Rolling Stone had written about Eramo "with actual malice, the burden plaintiff must meet to support her lawsuit."

To prove defamation under U.S. libel laws, it must be shown that a media organization deliberately published information it knew to be untrue with the intent of damaging the subject's reputation.

Sex assaults remain a major concern on U.S. college campuses. Some reports estimate that one in five female students will be a victim of sexual assault during their college years.