Princess Eugenie's wedding: Why these royal nuptials are courting controversy - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 16, 2024, 05:47 PM | Calgary | 3.7°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
WorldAnalysis

Princess Eugenie's wedding: Why these royal nuptials are courting controversy

Prince Andrew's daughter, Princess Eugenie, is set to marry Jack Brooksbank this Friday, in a celebration that is garnering some criticism - and, in ways, seems to mirror the wedding of her cousin and higher-profile royal, Prince Harry.

Marriage of Queen's granddaughter in Windsor attracting some criticism over security costs

Princess Eugenie is getting married to Jack Brooksbank. The pair started dating seven years ago. (Jonathan Brady/Getty Images)

It's bound to bring back royal wedding memories of Prince Harry and MeghanMarkle'scarriage ride through the streets of Windsor.

Harry's cousin Princess Eugenie, 28,and JackBrooksbank, 32, are planning a horse-drawn jaunt after their wedding inSt. George's Chapelon Friday, perhaps in a glass coach if rain seems likely.

Butwhile much shorterthan Harry and Meghan's, Eugenie'sceremonial excursion,and the security it will require,havestirred controversy over the nuptials of thismore junior royalwho seems to be aiming for a wedding to rival the one her higher-ranking relative had in May.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle leave in a carriage after their wedding ceremony on May 19. (Yui Mok/Associated Press)

"Princess Eugenie is a private citizen in many respects," said Toronto-based royal historian and author Carolyn Harris. "She doesn't have that range of public engagements, and so there's some popular controversy about the perception that she's trying to emulate the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle."

Emulate and maybe even exceed.

"I think the scale of this wedding has surprised a lot of people," said royal author and Vanity Fair royal correspondent KatieNicholl. "It's going to be just as star-studded as Meghan and Harry's and even bigger."

Harry, who is sixth in the line of succession to his grandmother Queen Elizabeth, had about 600 guests watchinghim wed Meghan in the chapel. Eugenie, three steps down in the royal ranks, apparently has about 850 on her guest list.

Her party, it's said, will be spread over two days, with a more informal gathering for some guests planned on Saturday. Harry and Meghan, whose wedding Harris says was in ways a bit more understated than expected for a royal of his rank, were wed and celebrated in one day.

Who pays?

And then there's the money. While the Royal Family is paying for Eugenie'swedding itself, security costs will be borne by the British taxpayer. That tally has been estimated to be in the range of two million pounds. And that hasn't gone over well in some quarters.

"If the royals want to turn Eugenie and Jack's big day into a public event, they need to pick up the bill all of it," anti-monarchist group Republic says in anonline petition urging the British government to commit "no public money" toEugenie's wedding.

Republic presented the petition, which by midday Thursday had garnered more than 44,000 signatures, to Labour MP Emma Dent Coad.

She said she expects that support extends far beyond those who signed the petition.

"To me it's unconscionable that a minor member of the Royal Family who doesn't even have a role is having her dream wedding subsidized, when in the same [London] borough that she's moving into ... we have food banks, we have people literally starving," Coadsaid in an interview outside the U.K. Parliament.

Armed police secure the route of the carriage procession prior to the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan on May 19. The carriage procession for Princess Eugenie and Jack Brooksbank will also come down this road from Windsor Castle and turn at this corner. (Frank Augstein/Associated Press)

Another Labour MP also voiced his opposition to any public expenditure. Chris Williamson told Sky News in August that the security bill facing taxpayers is "completely unacceptable."

Williamson said the "fabulously wealthy" father of the bride, Prince Andrew, Duke of York, should fund the additional expenses himself.

What isunfolding around this wedding could also be theresult of Andrew's reported view that Eugenie and her elder sister Beatrice who will be maid of honour Friday deserve more than they get from the Royal Family.

"Certainly there have been indications in the past that he would like his daughters to have a more active role in terms of public engagements" and full security, says Harris.

Andrew also reportedly wanted Eugenie's nuptials televised live on the BBC, an idea the British broadcaster turned down, apparently apprehensive about just how many viewers would tune in for a service that begins at 11 a.m. local time (6 a.m. ET). Rival network ITV will offer live coverage in the U.K.

Nicholl says she's been told Andrew wanted the carriage procession and for the wedding to be televised.

"According to my sources, Prince Andrew feels very much that it's his daughter's right as a blood princessand ninth in line to the throne to have her moment in the spotlight and a royal wedding with all the trimmings."

What about the mother of the bride?

Wedding watcherswill also likely focus some of their attention on the mother of the bride, Sarah Ferguson, who is divorced from Andrew, but still very close to him.

"In terms of this wedding, there's a lot of interest in how the Duchess of York will be received by the Royal Family," says Harris.

Prince Andrew and Sarah, Duchess of York, are divorced, but remain close and have been seen together, including at Royal Ascot in 2015, along with their daughters, Princess Eugenie, centre, and Princess Beatrice, far right. (Toby Melville/Reuters)

Scandal surrounded the demise of Andrew and Sarah's marriage in the early 1990s, and it's long been thought thather former father-in-law, Prince Philip, has little use for his former daughter-in-law. The Daily Telegraph has reported that Philipand Sarahhaven't spoken since the divorce came through in 1996.

Nicholl doesn't expect Sarah will be an issue Friday. "She's very nervous about coming face-to-face with her former father-in-law,but they will both have to be adults about the whole thing, for the sake of the bride. No one wants anything to spoil Eugenie's big day."

Whether the 97-year-old Philip, who had hip replacement surgery in April,will attend the wedding is unclear. Nichollsays Philip adores Eugenie and wants to be there. She wants her grandfather to be there, too.On Wednesday, newspapers were reporting thatPhilipwill make a last-minute decision about whether to go to the chapel.

The wedding also focuses further scrutiny on Eugenie and Beatrice themselves.

The sisters have taken tabloid hits over the years, especially for lavish holidays, and have garnered significant attention for fashion selections that seemed somewhat questionable.

Beatrice's hatfor the wedding of Harry's older brother Prince William in 2011 variously described as resemblinga doughnut-shaped spaceshipor atoilet seat was particularly memorable.

The hats Eugenie, left, and Beatrice, right, wore to the royal wedding of their cousin Prince William in 2011 drew a lot of attention - not all of it flattering. (Toby Melville/Reuters)

Any further scrutiny on the sisters prompted by this wedding could have a broader impact for the House of Windsor.

"If Eugenie's wedding is perceived as particularly lavish," says Harris, "it's going to lead to wider discussions about the role of junior members of the Royal Family."

What will the junior royals do?

It's a debate Harris says is going to be relevant goinginto the next generation, when, for example, the question would arise about just what sort of life William's third child, Prince Louis, might lead.

"Beatrice and Eugenie have already granted interviews where they've said that they're unique in a sense, because they are princesses who are also pursuing careers," says Harris.

And that may well be the way things are going, with royal cousins not having the public or official profile oflower-ranking royals in previous generations.

Junior royals were nowhere to be seen as the Queen's Diamond Jubilee celebrations drew to close in 2012. The Buckingham Palace balcony, which has often been jam-packed with royal relatives on formal occasions, was limited to, from left, Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall; Prince Charles; Queen Elizabeth; Prince William; Kate, Duchess of Cambridge; and Prince Harry. (Stefan Wermuth/Reuters)

Certainly there were hints of that as far back as the Queen's 2012 Diamond Jubilee. At that time, a Buckingham Palace balcony appearance featured only the Queen(Prince Philip was in hospital), her heir Prince Charles and his wife, Camilla, next-in-line William and his wife, Kate, and Harry. Missing were the numerous royal relations who have often been on the balcony, too.

"The trend going forward seems to be a more streamlined Royal Family," says Harris, "and of course that opens up the wide question [of the] role of more junior members of the Royal Family and what sort of public profile they should have."

With files from Thomas Daigle