Landmark transgender rights case before U.S. Supreme Court - Action News
Home WebMail Wednesday, November 13, 2024, 08:23 AM | Calgary | -0.5°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
World

Landmark transgender rights case before U.S. Supreme Court

For the first time the U.S. Supreme Court will rule on transgender rights case in which a Virginia public school district is fighting to prevent a female-born transgender high school student from using the boys' bathroom.

Virginia school district wants to ban transgender student from using boys' bathroom

In a landmark move, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to rule on a transgender rights case. (Gary Cameron/Reuters)

For the first time, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to rule on transgender rights in a case in which a Virginia public school district is fighting to prevent a female-born transgender high school student from using the boys' bathroom.

The justices agreed to hear theGloucesterCounty SchoolBoard's appeal of a lower court's April 19 ruling thattransgenderstudents are protected under U.S. laws barringsex-based discrimination.

The case involves a 17-year-old transgender student named Gavin Grimm, who identifies as male and sued to win the right to use the school's boys' bathroom.

The case, due to be argued and decided before the end of June, will be one of the biggest of the court's term.

"I never thought that my restroom use would ever turn into any kind of national debate. The only thing I ever asked for was the right to be treated like everyone else," Grimm said in a statement.

"These sorts of discriminatory policies stigmatize and isolate transgender students like Gavin just because of who they are," said Josh Block, his lawyer at the American Civil Liberties Union.

'Bodily privacy'

Conservative groups have backed the school district, saying the fight is about student privacy rights.

"In light of the right to bodily privacy, federal law should not be twisted to require that a male be given access to the girls' facilities, or a female to the boys' facilities," said Gary McCaleb, a lawyer with the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal group.

At the heart of the case is the question of whether transgender people are covered by a ban on gender discrimination in education under federal law. The Obama administration says they are, but there is a legal fight over whether judges are required to defer to the government's view of the law.

The court could side-step a major ruling by focusing its ruling on whether the federal government followed the correct procedure when it gave notice of its legal determination.

The court remains one justice short following the February death of Antonin Scalia, which left it with four conservatives and four liberals. That raises the possibility of a 4-4 ruling that would leave in place the decision favouring Grimm by the Richmond-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. A 4-4 ruling would set no nationwide legal precedent.

The court until now had generally steered clear of taking up potentially divisive cases while it remained shorthanded.

Previous ruling on transgender inmate

The Supreme Court has not directly ruled on transgender rights before. But in 1994 the court did rule in favour of a male-born transgender prison inmate identifying as a woman who was held with male prisoners and said she was beaten and raped by another inmate.

President Barack Obama's administration in May issued nationwide guidance telling public schools that transgender students should be allowed to use the bathroom of their choice.

That action infuriated many conservatives and prompted a Republican-led legal effort to fight it. A total of 23 states sued to block the guidance. A U.S. district court judge on Aug. 22 issued a nationwide injunction sought by Texas and other states preventing the administration from enforcing the guidance.

In the Virginia case, the Supreme Court in July voted 5-3 to temporarily block the appeals court decision from going into effect, a move that prevented Grimm from using the boys' bathroom when the new school year began in September while the case remained under appeal by the school district.

Grimm began attending school as a boy in September 2014. With the school's permission, Grimm used the boys' bathroom for about seven weeks without incident.

But after complaints from parents, the county school board adopted a new policy in December 2014 that required students to use the bathroom that corresponded with their gender at birth.

Since then, Grimm has had to use a separate restroom. He sued in 2015. As a result of hormone therapy, Grimm has facial hair and a deep voice. Grimm has also had chest reconstruction surgery but not sex reassignment surgery.