UN Human Rights Council votes to probe Philippines drug war deaths - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 15, 2024, 01:52 AM | Calgary | -5.3°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
World

UN Human Rights Council votes to probe Philippines drug war deaths

The UNHuman Rights Council voted on Thursday to set up an investigation into mass killings during Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte's so-called war on drugs, a step activists said was long overdue.

Duterte rants against Iceland for bringing resolution his spokesperson calls 'grotesquely one-sided'

Katherine Bautista, left, 37, and Emily Soriano, 49, former supporters of Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte's drug war, hold pictures in Manila of their sons who they said were killed in police drug war operations. Activists say at least 27,000 people have been killed as a result of the president's so-called war on drugs. (Jake C Salvador/AFP/Getty Images)

The UNHuman Rights Council voted on Thursday to set up an investigation into mass killings during Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte's so-called war on drugs, a step activists said was long overdue.

Duterte's government says police have killed about 6,600 people in shootouts with suspected drug dealers since he was elected in 2016 on a platform of crushing crime. Activists say the death toll is at least 27,000.

The firstresolution on the Philippines, led by Iceland, was adopted by a vote of 18 countries in favour and 14 against, including China. Fifteen countries abstained from the vote, including Japan.

"This is not just a step towards paying justice for the thousands of families of victims of extrajudicial killings in the Philippines, but it is also a message that we collectively send out to those who have praised President Duterte," said Ellecer (Budit) Carlos of the Manila-based rights group iDEFEND.

"This war on drugs, as we have repeatedly said, it's a sham war."

Philippine activists say tens of thousands of people are being killed as police terrorize poor communities, using cursory drug "watch lists" to identify suspected users or dealers, and executing many in the guise of sting operations.

Police deny that, saying all the killings were in self-defence.

Myca Ulpina, a three-year-old girl killed on June 29 near Manila, was among the latest and youngest known victims. Police say her father, Renato, used his daughter as a human shield.

'Maliciously partisan'

On Friday, Duterte took a swipe at the country that introduced the resolution, in a rambling speech to Corrections Department officials.

"You have too much ice and there is no clear day and night there. So you can understand why there is no crime, no policeman either, and they just go about eating ice," said Duterte.

"They don't understand the social, economic, political problems of the Philippines."

Duterte's spokesperson, Salvador Panelo, a day earlier questioned the validity of a resolution not backed by the majority of council members, saying Filipinos overwhelmingly backed the president's unique leadership approach.

"The resolution is grotesquely one-sided, outrageously narrow, and maliciously partisan," Panelo said in a lengthy statement.

"It reeks of nauseating politics completely devoid of respect for the sovereignty of our country, even as it is bereft of the gruesome realities of the drug menace."

Asked by reporters in Manila whether he would allow UNrights officials access to investigate, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte said, 'Let them state their purpose and I will review it.' (Bullit Marquez/The Associated Press)

The delegation from the Philippines, which is among the council's 47 members, had lobbied hard against the resolution, which asks national authorities to prevent extrajudicial killings and co-operate with UNhuman rights chief Michelle Bachelet, who is expected to report her findings in June 2020.

Philippines Ambassador Evan Garcia said the Duterte administration was committed to upholding justice, adding, "We will not tolerate any form of disrespect or acts of bad faith. There will be consequences, far-reaching consequences."

Laila Matar of New York-based Human Rights Watch criticized his comments.

"It was quite clear that they threatened consequences for those who had supported the resolution, which in turn makes us concerned for the many human rights defenders, civil society activists and journalists on the ground," she told the briefing.

If Duterte allows the investigation and it proceeds impartially, Panelo said, "We are certain its result will only lead to the humiliation of the investigators, as well as of Iceland and the 17 other nations."