U.S. Senate votes to fund government, avoid shutdown - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 10:18 AM | Calgary | -12.0°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
World

U.S. Senate votes to fund government, avoid shutdown

The U.S. Senate has voted to temporarily fund the government and avoid a federal shutdown over President Donald Trump's border wall.

Legislation still needs to pass through the House by Friday

The U.S. Senate took a key step towards keeping the U.S. government running Wednesday evening. (J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press)

The U.S. Senate approved legislation late Wednesday to temporarily fund the government, a key step toward averting a federal shutdown after President Donald Trump backed off his demand for money for a border wall with Mexico.

Senators passed the measure, which would keep government running to Feb. 8, by voice vote without a roll call. The House is also expected to move before Friday's deadline, when funding for a portion of the government expires.

Without resolution, more than 800,000 federal workers would face furloughs or be forced to work without pay, disrupting government operations days before Christmas.

While the White House indicated Trump was open to reviewing whatever Congress could pass, the president did not immediately weigh in on the short-term plan.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said the Senate will remain in session Thursday. "We have to see what the House does," he said.

Many of Trump's supporters were frustrated that he appeared to retreat on his shutdown threats after promising a fight over the wall, which had been central to his presidential campaign. Just last week Trump said he would be "proud" to shut down the government over his demand for $5 billion for the wall. Some allies described the move as caving on his pledge, expressing concern that it could hurt Trump's 2020 prospects.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell lashed out at Democrats for failing to provide any of the funding for the wall. (J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press)

Republican Rep. Mark Meadows,a leader of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, said Trump's political base "will just go crazy" if he signs a bill without wall funding. He warned it will be tougher to win the money next year when Democrats control the House. He said supporters of the president "believe it's a promise that he's been telling them that he will keep."

On Twitter, Trump appeared to respond to criticism by insisting that "one way or the other, we will win on the Wall!"

McConnell, though, portrayed the short-term spending measure as a "simple" bill that would show that Republicans, who control Congress now, will finish the year by not prolonging a potential crisis.

"Republicans will continue to fill our duty to govern," he said.

Voting was delayed until late Wednesday as a bipartisan group of lawmakers, mostly from the West, sought to include language reauthorizing a popular program that supports conservation and outdoor recreation projects. The Land and Water Conservation Fund expired Sept. 30, and they've been trying to extend it, but no agreement was reached and talks will continue.

It was unclear how many House members would return to Washington for votes after Republicans lost the majority in the midterm election. Some 70 members missed Wednesday's session, almost as many Democrats as Republicans.

With Republicans sour on the spending package, passage could depend on Democrats.

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California, the speaker-designate for the new Congress in January, talks to reporters. (J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press)

Democratic House leader Nancy Pelosi, who is on track to become speaker when Democrats take control Jan. 3, signalled support for ensuring funding.

Should the legislation become law, the border money fight would drag into the next Congress, which could prove even more difficult for Trump.

Pelosi will likely be able to quickly win approval of a longer-term measure to keep government running in 2019.

"Democrats will be ready to fully, responsibly fund our government in January," Pelosi said in a statement.

As some Republicans grumbled that Trump caved, McConnell lashed out at Democrats for failing to give Trump any of the $5 billionthat he wanted for the wall. The bill keeps funding at current levels, $1.3 billion, for border security and fencing, but not for the wall.

"This seems to be the reality of our political moment," McConnell said. "It seems like political spite for the president may be winning out over sensible policy."

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer argued that Democrats refused to fund the wall because Trump promised Americans the Mexicans would pay for it something Mexico has refused to do. (J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press)

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumersaid Democrats oppose Trump's border demands because the wall is "inefficient" and because Trump, as a candidate, promised that Mexico would pay for it, which Mexico has refused to do.

"We want smart, effective border security," Schumer said. "That's not a wall."

But the White House showed its willingness to budge as it became apparent the president did not have support in Congress for paying for the wall.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders indicated earlier this week that Trump did not want to shut down the government. She said the administration was looking at ways to find the money elsewhere, though that was uncertain because it would also likely need congressional approval.

Congress did pass legislation to fund much of the government through the current budget year, until next Oct. 1.

Several lawmakers have complained that the appropriations process continues to be tangled in partisan politics. Top appropriators had tried to improve the process this year by passing bipartisan bills that would have funded those agencies, as they hoped to stem the cycle of shutdown crises. They lamented having to abandon those efforts for the temporary measure.

Republican Sen. Richard Shelby, the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said they "worked a long time" on the bills, but hope "evaporated" as the shutdown risk deepened.