Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Ultrafine particles
Skip to main content

Ultrafine particles

Tiny and unregulated, UFPs have the potential to cause major health problems

We are speeding down a highway toward a hazy city.

When we talk about air pollution, most of us probably think about smog or the smoke associated with wildfires.

But scientists are learning more about a category of pollutants that are smaller in stature yet potentially more dangerous.

They're called ultrafine particles.

A thousand times thinner than a strand of hair, ultrafine particles (UFPs) are emitted by vehicles and industrial activity and according to a recent study led by researchers at McGill University in Montreal, contribute to more than 1,000 premature deaths a year in that city and Toronto.

Owing to their size, these nanoparticles can be breathed into the lungs and pass into the bloodstream.

"They've also been found in people's brains, so they certainly have access to our entire system, in terms of where they can reach," said Scott Weichenthal, an associate professor in the department of epidemiology, biostatistics and occupational health at McGill and lead author of the study.

UFP size comparison

Visual comparison of small particles, starting with a grain of fine beach sand , then the diameter of a human hair, a dust mote,  particle matter, and finally ultrafine particle matter

A 2020 study from the University of Illinois found that "compared to fine particles [ultrafine particles] cause more pulmonary inflammation and are retained longer in the lung."

The study says UFPs have been found to cause cardiovascular disease and are linked to cancer and diabetes in adults; exposure can also lead to greater rates of babies with low birth weights.

A study this year by Brussels-based advocacy group Transport and Environment determined thousands of cases of high blood pressure, diabetes and dementia across Europe could be linked to UFPs emitted by airplanes.

According to Weichenthal, the McGill-led study was the first to examine UFPs and mortality in Canada. 

A smiling young man in a t-shirt stands on a sidewalk
Scott Weichenthal, associate professor in the department of epidemiology, biostatistics and occupational health at McGill University in Montreal, and lead author of a recent study of ultrafine particles in urban environments. (Franois Couture Photographie)

The researchers measured UFPs in Toronto and Montreal during 2020-2021. They then developed models to predict geographic variations in air pollution across each city and estimate the exposure information using historical traffic emissions data from 2001 and 2016.

Like similar research done in Europe, the study found areas closest to large thoroughfares, airports and rail yards showed high concentrations of UFPs.

Weichenthal said that researchers have known about UFPs for several decades, but "no one around the world regulates them."

"It's something that we're building evidence toward," he said.

Non-tailpipe emissions

For regulation purposes, particles are categorized by their diameter. When they have a diameter of less than 10 micrometres (PM10 in shorthand), they can get into the lungs and lead to adverse health effects. Fine particulate matter refers to particles that are 2.5 micrometres or less (PM2.5), and includes smoke, dust and pollen.

Ultrafine particles are even smaller: 0.1 micrometres or less (PM0.1).

UFPs are typically generated by combustion-related activities. Road vehicles are the primary source of those emissions in urban areas. While some of that pollution comes from exhaust, other key sources of UFPs are tires, rotors and brake pads what are known as non-tailpipe emissions. 

Skip embedded content

Greater uptake of electric vehicles should decrease overall carbon emissions, but a 2023 study by the University of Toronto found that EVs owing to the sheer weight of the battery might generate more UFPs from brakes and tires.

"There's this mounting evidence that electric vehicles are heavier, so they're creating more from that friction of tires on the road," said Marianne Hatzopoulou,
department chair of civil and mineral engineering at the University of Toronto and a Canada Research chair in transportation decarbonization and air quality.

She calls this one of the unanticipated tradeoffs of climate action.

"We're rushing to decarbonize but wait a minute, there's something that we're not focusing on."

The aviation angle

Hatzapoulou has studied UFPs for years. After appearing in an episode of CBC's The Nature of Things on air pollution in 2019, she was approached by residents of a downtown Toronto neighbourhood called Bathurst Quay to do an air quality study.

The area is bounded to the north by the bustling Gardiner Expressway, but the study determined that nearby Billy Bishop Airport is a larger source of UFPs.

Based on readings at Hanlan's Point on Toronto Island, winds from the south generally carry about 33 per cent more UFPs averaged over a 24-hour period. But the increase at Bathurst Quay can be more than 85 per cent in that same time frame.

The airport, which is just south of the neighbourhood, sees roughly 50 to 70 departures a day. During periods of aircraft operation, the study found momentary UFP spikes exceeding 100,000 particles per cubic centimetre. For comparison, the World Health Organization describes 20,000 particles/cm3 for a one-hour average as "high."

Skip embedded content

Measured from June 8 to July 10, 2022 while an electric ferry was in operation. These are the mean values, based on data for the full 24h day with 95% confidence intervals for each site. Data were excluded when the wind speed was below 1 m/s to ensure the reliability of wind direction.

As the Transport and Environment study showed, people living near airports are especially affected by UFPs. The study estimated people situated within a five-kilometre radius of an airport breathe in air that contains, on average, anywhere from 3,000 to 10,000 particles/cm3 emitted by aircraft.

And yet, there is no global regulation for UFPs.

Marianne Hatzopoulou, department chair of civil and nineral engineering at the University of Toronto, has studied ultrafine particles for years. (Johnny Guatto/University of Toronto)

Health Canada was unable to provide a source to comment on this story, but in a statement, the agency said it "recognizes that air pollution is among the largest environmental health risks." It estimates exposure to air pollution contributes to 17,400 deaths annually in Canada, of which 12,500 are attributable to particulate matter smaller than PM2.5.

The statement also pointed to the World Health Organization's 2021 review of the available science, which concluded there's insufficient scientific evidence to fully understand the health effects and develop air quality guidelines specifically for UFPs.

Hatzapoulou says there's long been "this disparity between science and regulation and policy."

"The science on ultrafine particles is growing. We have a lot of evidence, but we don't yet have enough to drive policy."


Graphics: Wendy Martinez, Amedeo De Palma | Development: Dwight Friesen

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices | About CBC News
Corrections and clarifications| Submit a news tip