The Hidden Reason Chicago Was Such A Rousing Success For Democrats

This article is part of HuffPosts biweekly politics newsletter. Click here to subscribe .

Democrats are charging out of their national convention with enthusiasm and determination and in far better shape than seemed possible just a few weeks ago, when then-presumptive nominee President Joe Biden was headed for likely defeat. 

Vice President Kamala Harris has wiped out Bidens deficit in the polls, and now holds small but discernible leads over Donald Trump in both national and swing state surveys. Shes also expanded the electoral map , putting in play states such as North Carolina that seemed lost to Democrats when Biden was leading the ticket.

As of this writing, Nate Silver s predictive model suggests Harris is a 52.8% favorite to win.

It will take a few days for pollsters to figure out whether Harris got the traditional convention bounce, pushing her support even higher, or whether she got a version of it beforehand via the burst of activity and favorable press coverage around her campaign launch.

Either way, its hard to look back on the week in Chicago and deem it anything but a smashing political success, from the (still reverberating) call to arms by former first lady Michelle Obama to the (still circulating) sight of Gus Walz , son of vice presidential nominee Minnesota Gov. Tim, tearfully telling the crowd thats my dad!

Harris, for her part, gave what my colleague Jen Benderys story called the speech of her life . Plenty of other analysts rendered similar judgments . 

With a passionate, near-flawless delivery, Harris introduced herself as the daughter of immigrants who valued virtue and hard work, promising to fight for the middle class and vowing to protect democracy. She wrapped herself metaphorically in the flag and what she thinks it represents to the nations non-MAGA majority.

The laser focus on trying to win over swing voters was impossible to miss, in part because it was such an overriding theme all week whether through cultural symbolism (like having the aging veterans of Walzs championship high school football team appear on stage) or more overt outreach (like having former House Republican Adam Kinzinger give a prime-time address).

But the appeal to the political middle had some telling substantive elements too. 

Insofar as Harris and Democrats talked about policy, they focused on causes such as bringing down prescription drug prices, providing paid leave or helping families to pay for child care ambitions considerably more modest than the loftier, more progressive Medicare for All calls that dominated the last Democratic presidential campaign and to which Harris herself once pledged fealty .

Harris also went out of her way to back a bipartisan immigration bill that would tighten security without creating a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants already here, which is a provision progressives have frequently called essential. 

The platform evolved, with party leaders scrubbing a call to end the death penalty quietly, until my colleague Jessica Schulberg found out about it . They also refused requests to feature a Palestinian speaker on the conflict in Gaza. That part wasnt so quiet, or unanticipated. In fact, the prospect of protests and disruptions over Bidens support for Israel had fueled speculation that Chicago 2024 was going to end up as tumultuous as Chicago 1968.

But as HuffPosts Daniel Marans and Jonathan Nicholson observed, the fissures never blew up into 1968-style conflicts not over Gaza, or any other issues for that matter. On the contrary, the Democrats seemed improbably and almost impossibly unified, with would-be progressive dissidents like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) sounding downright giddy about the Harris-Walz ticket.

What explains this unified enthusiasm? Three likely reasons come to mind. One in particular has a lot to do with how the party has changed in recent years and what it might be able to do if Harris manages to win.

Democrats In Array

One of these likely reasons is the threat Trump poses to individual liberties, the rule of law and democracy threats progressives feel every bit as keenly as the more moderates in the party. These threats almost certainly seem even more menacing now after so many months watching Biden struggle. 

Staring into the political abyss this way has been known to focus the mind.

Another possible factor is Harris identity. Electing the first woman president, not to mention the first Black woman and the first Asian woman, would have obvious symbolic value. But it would also have more practical effects namely, bringing a new perspective to the presidency and making it easier for other women, and other nonwhite politicians, to make their own way to the Oval Office.

Progressives almost by definition care about these things, enough that it can help counterbalance appeal for politicians who see the ticket as less progressive than they might like. Barack Obama in 2008 benefited from just such a dynamic, as The New York Times David Leonhardt pointed out on Friday: He was more moderate than some other Democratic candidates that year, yet he still excited many progressives.

Harris notably hasnt talked about herself as groundbreaker, and the campaign hasnt made that possibility a focus in the way that, say, Hillary Clintons did in 2016. But thats of a piece with Harris broader strategy since appeals tied to race or class can alienate some of the swing voters shes trying to win. The voters who feel otherwise, meanwhile, dont need reminders.

This brings us to the third, and potentially most important, theory for progressive enthusiasm: Democrats have gotten an awful lot done since Biden took office. An awful lot of it consisted of initiatives or reforms progressives have long championed. And most importantly, it all happened with progressives having a big seat at the table.

The most significant and visible of these accomplishments was the clean green energy investments of the Inflation Reduction Act, which add up (arguably) to the most important climate change legislation in history, plus the laws health care provisions, which for the first time gave the federal government leverage over the prices of some high-priced drugs in Medicare .

But the list goes beyond that, to the appointment of aggressively pro-consumer and pro-labor officials at key federal agencies, and the burst of spending during the pandemic that (whatever its real or theorized effects on inflation) drove both unemployment and child poverty down to near-record levels.

All of these feel well short of the kinds of transformations progressives would prefer with, say, enactment of Medicare for All. But they had, are having or will have tangible, measurable effects on peoples lives and are examples of the kind of achievements that might be possible if Harris wins and Democrats have control of both congressional houses again.

It so happens that these are also the kinds of achievements that animate up-and-coming party leaders, even if they are not members of the progressive wing figures like Govs. Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania and Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan, or Sen. Raphael Warnock of Georgia. Not coincidentally, all gave Harris rousing endorsements in prime-  time speeches .

But that too is part of the story about unity: The partys moderate wing today feels pretty strongly about using the federal government to make peoples lives better, just as it does about protecting the freedoms Trump threatens. They may emphasize it differently focusing more exclusively on the Inflation Reduction Acts clean energy manufacturing jobs , for example, and a bit less on its environmental impact. They still land in the same place on policy.

Whether these good feelings would carry through enough to enact a legislative agenda is obviously a separate question and one that is very secondary to the question of whether Democrats even get that opportunity. 

The presidential race is still a toss-up, or maybe even a bit worse than that for Harris if the polling now is missing Trump votes the way it did in 2016 and again in 2020. Republicans remain by most accounts a slight favorite to hold at least one house of Congress.

But Harris is coming out of Chicago on a roll, with a party behind her as she reaches out to the swing voters she needs to win. Thats a pretty good place to be.