Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Posted: 2024-10-02T12:50:31Z | Updated: 2024-10-02T12:50:31Z CNN Anchor's Brutal Take On Tim Walz's Debate Performance Focuses On 1 Problem | HuffPost

CNN Anchor's Brutal Take On Tim Walz's Debate Performance Focuses On 1 Problem

Abby Phillip honed in on a particular weakness of the Democratic vice presidential nominee.

CNN anchor Abby Phillip pounced on Democrat Tim Walz s clear lack of preparation for his vice presidential debate against Republican JD Vance on Tuesday. (Watch the video below.)

Phillip said the mostly civil showdown was punctuated by Ohio Sen. Vance connecting on his blows, which Minnesota Gov. Walz allowed, she said.

JD Vance came to this debate to land a bunch of punches, and he did, she said. He landed a lot of punches in between all the niceties and all of that. And the thing that really stood out to me was that Tim Walz did not seem prepared for it.

He didnt respond to a lot of the criticisms and attacks that Vance put on the table, she continued. He allowed some clear falsehoods to just go completely unanswered. He allowed JD Vance essentially to dodge on a whole host of issues. On climate change. On the issue of his flip-flopping on Donald Trump . He allowed Vance initially to claim that Tump salvaged the Affordable Care Act. It took him several sentences to get to the part of his answer .. where he actually responded to that.

I think there was a clear lack of preparation and execution here on Walzs part, she concluded.

Vances non-Trump behavior may thrown Walz, who was too nice and missed opportunities to attack his opponent, HuffPost wrote .

Meanwhile, Vance showed himself to be a smoother and more policy-focused version of Trump, making his points without Trumps seething rage, his divisive and racist language and his uncontrollable narcissism, HuffPost reported . At the same time, he lied just as much as Trump.

Walz did confront Vance on refusing to answer whether Trump lost the 2020 election, but that was not enough for many.

Nearly all of the 13 New York Times columnists and contributors  who were asked to analyze the debate gave Vance the victory, with one echoing Phillips sentiment. Vance seemed smoother and more practiced, Jane Coaston wrote.

Support Free Journalism

Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

Support HuffPost