Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Posted: 2020-10-16T19:51:20Z | Updated: 2020-10-16T19:53:26Z

Many progressives were dismayed this week upon hearing Sen. Dianne Feinsteins (D-Calif.) heap praise on this weeks confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett, calling them one of the best set of hearings that Ive participated in.

The comments from the 87-year-old Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee accompanied by her embrace with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) afterward symbolized to progressives the partys inability to play hardball on court nominations and sparked an outcry among some groups who called for her removal from the panel.

She has undercut Democrats position at every step of this process, from undermining calls for filibuster and Court reform straight through to thanking Republicans for the most egregious partisan power grab in the modern history of the Supreme Court, said Brian Fallon, founder and executive director of Demand Justice, a progressive judicial advocacy group.

On Friday, Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.), a progressive rock star who has expressed interest in serving in the Senate, also said she disagreed with the senior senator from California.

Porter specifically pointed to Barretts evasiveness in response to basic questions about health care, abortion, guns and even climate change as reasons why the hearings were a disappointment.

I disagree strongly with Sen. Feinstein that that set of hearings was one of the best or was even acceptable, Porter said in an interview with HuffPost. I think Amy Coney Barrett did not answer basic questions about her beliefs and stonewalled repeatedly. We got many fewer direct answers than we have out of most Supreme Court hearings.

I thought it was a very poor set of hearings, Porter added.

Democrats succeeded in landing few, if any, blows against Barrett, a conservative judge who once clerked for the late Justice Antonin Scalia. They railed against the process as illegitimate and a sham, especially after Republicans blocked President Barack Obama from appointing a Supreme Court justice in a similar election year. And they cast the nomination as a vote that could threaten the future of the Affordable Care Act.

Support Free Journalism

Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

Support HuffPost

Even before this weeks hearings began, Democrats expressed concern that Feinstein the second-oldest lawmaker in Congress who won reelection in 2018 wouldnt be up to the task of leading her party in the Supreme Court battle. Those concerns only deepened among some Democrats after the hearings ended.

Its very hard to watch a colleague in decline. That this is occurring publicly is even harder, one Democratic senator, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told HuffPost on Thursday.

Support Free Journalism

Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

Support HuffPost