Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Sign Up

Sign Up

Please fill this form to create an account.

Already have an account? Login here.

Posted: 2022-01-11T03:59:27Z | Updated: 2022-01-11T03:59:27Z

A California appeals court has upheld the firing of two Los Angeles police officers who shirked a call about an active robbery to play Pokmon Go.

Louis Lozano and Eric Mitchell were fired for ignoring the call to respond to an April 2017 robbery at a mall in the Baldwin Hills community.

When questioned about the incident by LAPD Sgt. Jose Gomez that evening, the men claimed not to have heard the call, according to court documents filed Friday. However, an in-car recording of their conversation revealed that they had heard the call, spoke about it and decided not to respond, court records show.

Aw, screw it, Lozano reportedly said after a discussion about the call. Five minutes later, Mitchell allegedly told Lozano that a Pokemon character known as a Snorlax had popped up nearby.

For about the next 20 minutes, the officers could be heard on the in-car recording discussing Pokmon as they drove to different locations where the virtual creatures apparently appeared on their mobile phones, court documents said.

After capturing the Snorlax, the officers then traveled to another location to capture another Pokemon, known as a Togetic.

When their car stopped again, the DICVS recorded Mitchell saying, Dont run away. Dont run away, while Lozano described how he buried it and ultra-balled the Togetic before announcing, Got him, court documents said.

Support Free Journalism

Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

Support HuffPost

The men appealed the decision to fire them, arguing that the video evidence of their private conversation was inadmissible and that they were improperly questioned about the incident without the opportunity to have a legal representative present.

The court upheld the decision to fire them, characterizing their behavior as egregious misconduct that justified the use of the recordings. It also rejected their claim that their rights were violated during the questioning, saying that it was in the normal course of Gomezs duty to investigate the matter.

Greg Yacoubian, an attorney for the officers, said they obviously are disappointed in the ruling and were considering how to proceed, the Los Angeles Times reported .

Support Free Journalism

Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

Support HuffPost