Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Sign Up

Sign Up

Please fill this form to create an account.

Already have an account? Login here.

Posted: 2017-08-05T04:44:37Z | Updated: 2017-08-05T20:02:30Z

Robert Powelson, the newly-confirmed member of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, wasnt clear who he was referring to when he said that citizens who fight pipeline projects are engaged in a jihad at an industry conference in March. He may have been referring to the Standing Rock Sioux and all the other water protectors who withstood attack dogs, water cannons in sub-freezing temperatures, and countless other assaults in North Dakota last year. Perhaps he was referring to the Sisters of Loretto who successfully fought off the Bluegrass pipeline in Kentucky. He might have meant the residents of Pennsylvania and New Jersey who have flooded the FERC docket for the proposed PennEast pipeline with detailed comments, many from experts who have weighed in on everything from vulnerable species to sinkholes.

He could have been thinking of any of them and so many others. More likely, he was thinking of all of them. No matter. What Mr. Powelson calls a jihad, a term he uses as a pejorative which is concerning and revealing in its own right, is otherwise known as civic participation. That one of our two new FERC commissioners has so much disdain for it is disheartening.

Even more disheartening is the way he and Trumps other nominee, Neil Chatterjee, were approved by the Senate on Thursday.

Every U.S. senator has heard from coalitions and networks representing hundreds of organizations for nearly a year via letters, lobby visits, social media, petitions, protests, sit-ins and many of the other tactics that comprise the civic participants toolbox, the same tools former Congressional staffers thought were so effective when the Tea Party used them that they wrote a guide about them and started the Indivisible movement. The underlying message has remained the same. Investigate abuses of power at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. When Trump officially nominated Powelson and Chatterjee, the Senate became the focus of the campaign and a second message was added. Reject all FERC nominees until you have addressed the abuses of power at the Commission.

As the healthcare vote, Senator McCains terrible diagnosis, and the parade of Trump disasters added layers of complication to the Senate recess schedule, it became harder to predict when the vote might occur and easier to believe that it might not happen until after Labor Day.

A story in Platts on Thursday morning made it clear the vote was imminent. Trump had officially named two nominees to fill the remaining FERC vacancies, including the one Democrat needed to maintain parity on the Commission. Prior to the addition of Powelson and Chatterjee, FERCs only commissioner, Cheryl LaFleur, had been nominated by a Democratic president. The parity issue had been the sticking point for Democratic leaders.

When the news hit, people across the country took to their phones to call senate offices. Representatives of the activist network, Beyond Extreme Energy, staged a sit-in in Chuck Schumers office that led to the arrests of seven protesters who held up a banner and refused to move. Gauging the irritation in the voices of some staffers we called, there was no mistaking that our message was getting through.

Sometime after about 3:30, we started hearing from staffers that the Senate had recessed and would not return until September 5th. We called other offices to confirm it and got mixed messages. Some said the session had not ended, but that recess would begin as soon as it did and the vote would not take place until after Labor Day. Some offices gave us both messages. One staffer was quite testy, insisting that the recess had begun. Only one said that the Senate was still in session and the vote could still occur. We kept calling.

Just after 6:00, Lisa Murkowski asked to dispense with the quorum call, then said, I ask consent that the Senate vote on the nominations en bloc with no intervening action or debate and it was done.

The C-SPAN 2 camera trained on Ms. Murkowski showed her standing at the center of an arc of empty desks. Its hard to know which Senators were present and which were not. Were asking, but may never get a response.

They werent naming a post office. They were appointing two controversial nominees to a controversial commission. The people who had been calling all day were the ones who, for such a long time throughout their own fights to stop pipelines in their communities and as part of the FERC campaign, have done everything within their power to make their voices heard.

Theyve shown up at public hearings that are scheduled at odd hours in odd locations forcing them, at times, to miss work so they can be herded into an ante room, given a number, and herded one more time into an empty room with a FERC staffer and a tape recorder into which they must deliver their public comments.

Theyve attended open houses where the pipeline company du jour and regulators staff tables, sometimes with temp workers who know little, to address questions above the din of the crowd, set up in such a way that they can barely hear the answer the person across from them is providing and guarantees that people at other tables will not hear what theyve been told. Meanwhile, a gaggle of conspicuous identically-dressed men hover around the snack table. Theyre there to create a chilling effect.

Theyve commented over and over again on the FERC docket. Theyve filed motions to intervene. Theyve responded to every unsubstantiated claim the company or its supporters submit to the docket.

Support Free Journalism

Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

Support HuffPost

Theyve written letters to the editor. Theyve posted yard signs in their lawns. Theyve marched. Theyve gone to public meetings to call on their municipal leaders to pass resolutions against the pipeline. Theyve disrupted. Theyve resisted.

They are model citizens. And yesterdays vote is a perfect example of how model citizens are treated by their government. It came as no shock to them. Theyre used to it.

Mr. Powelson is surely eager to start using his brand new rubberstamp to start approving lots of pipelines. Hed better get used to all those jihadists. Hes going to create a lot more of them.

Oh yeah, one more thing about them. They vote.

Support Free Journalism

Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

Support HuffPost