Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Posted: 2017-12-12T13:27:47Z | Updated: 2017-12-12T13:27:47Z Trump, His Generals, and the Road to Authoritarianism | HuffPost

Trump, His Generals, and the Road to Authoritarianism

Trump, His Generals, and the Road to Authoritarianism
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

An article Sunday (12/10) at NBC focusing on Trump and his generals got me to thinking on this subject again. Its author, Suzanne Garment, suggests that Trump likes generals as obedient alpha males. They lend him credibility without directly threatening his delicate ego. And theres truth in this.

But I want to focus on other reasons for Trumps preference for generals in high positions. A year ago, I wrote an article for TomDispatch.com on All the Presidents Generals. That article focused mainly on the potential impact of these generals on Americas foreign policy and domestic culture. As I wrote last December:

Collectively, the team of Mattis, Flynn, and Kelly could not be more symbolic of the ongoing process of subversion of civilian control of the military. With Trump holding their reins, these self-styled warriors will soon take charge of the highest civilian positions overseeing the military of the worlds sole superpower. Dont think of this, however, as a Seven Days in May scenario in which a hard-headed general mounts a coup against an allegedly soft-hearted president. Its far worse. Who needs a coup when generals are essentially to be given free rein by a president-elect who fancies himself a military expert because, as a teenager, he spent a few years at a military-themed boarding school ?

In all of this, Trump represents just the next (giant) step in an ongoing process. His warrior-steeds, his dream team of generals, highlight Americas striking twenty-first-century embrace of militarism.

I continue to think this is true. Trump is empowering further military adventurism, even as he reinforces military-style solutions to problems. But there are other reasons for Trumps tight and eager embrace of the military.

Basically, by embracing the military and elevating it (while feeding it lots of money), Trump has neutralized it as a rival to his power. Indeed, he is borrowing from the militarys authority and standing within our culture to bolster his own.

Recall how Candidate Trump was often quite critical of the U.S. military. He knew more than the generals, he said. Their wars he often called wasteful follies. He was going to win (or end) these wars, he claimed, and hinted that quite a few loser generals might be on the receiving end of his infamous Youre fired line.

You hear none of this today. Trump is at pains to praise the military and his generals. He says theyre on a winning path, even in Afghanistan (because of Trumps decisions, naturally). He rewards them with record budgets and unalloyed praise.

And its working. The military (and the larger national security state) is content with Trump. Hes letting them have their way, which is another way of saying Trump is having his way.

In American society today, there arent too many power centers that truly can challenge Trump. The media hes diminished with all his attacks (Fake news!). A Republican Congress remains quietly subservient. Trump is stacking the judiciary with conservative judges to his liking. The Democratic Party remains feckless and divided. Bankers and corporations? Trump has hired the former and given a huge gift to the latter in the latest Republican tax cut for the richest.

When you think about it, the one power center that could challenge Trump is the military-industrial complex: Americas fourth branch of government. Yet by hiring so many of its generals and by praising it while passing loads of moola its way, Trump has co-opted its authority and power, attaching it to himself in his role as commander-in-chief.

Trumps last hurdle may be the Robert Mueller investigation into Russian meddling and possible complicity or obstruction by Trump. If Trump gets past this (perhaps even by firing Mueller), is there anyone left with the balls, the sand, the spine, the guts, the moxie (choose your favorite measure of fortitude) and the authority to stop his ambition and designs as an authoritarian leader?

William Astore, a retired lieutenant colonel (USAF) and history professor, blogs at Bracing Views . Hes been a HuffPost featured blogger since 2009.

Support Free Journalism

Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

Support HuffPost