Chief and police board apologize for failure at Pride, accept 'blueprint for renewal'

Hamilton's police services board says it "sincerely and unreservedly apologizes"and will implement all 38 recommendations from a damning report into the conduct of police before, during and after Hamilton's 2019 Pride festival.

An apology was also offered by Chief Eric Girt, as the Hamilton Police Services (HPS) board voted unanimously to accept the advice of Scott Bergman, a Toronto lawyer who spent months compiling a report about the violence that happened at the June 15, 2019 Gage Park celebration.

Bergman said the lack of planning meant police "failed to protect the public" at the event where several people were injured. His recommendations include working with organizers before the 2021 event, apologizing to the community, and looking at making the LGBTQ liaison officer a full-time position.

Bergman also recommended more LGBTQ-focused training, giving more support to the internal network of queer and trans officers and employees, and doing a diversity audit of the service, among other suggestions.

In a statement the board said "We accept criticism and feedback and will listen and learn from the Two Spirit and LGBTQIA+ communities in Hamilton."

Chief Eric Girt will report back to the board with a plan to implement the recommendations.

"We accept criticism and feedback and will listen and learn," said Mayor FredEisenberger, board chair,in a prepared statement.

"As chief, I take full responsibility for what happened at Pride before, during and after," Girt said. "I apologize to the community for inadequate planning and preparation for Hamilton Pride 2019."

Girt also said he "was sorry for statements made during and after the event that created the impression our response would have been different had we been invited... The lack of communication with Pride organizers before, during and after the event was unacceptable."

Girt also addressed perceptions about the fights that took place at Pride 2019. He said "any statements made during and after Pride that suggested there was a moral equivalency between those who sought to spread hatred and those who were defending the celebrations were wrong."

Despite the report being highly criticalof the force's actions, its leadership and culture, there was little debate or discussion and little questioning by board members of Bergman.

Bergman admonished Girt for comments he made after Pride

The incident happened last June, whenreligious protesters bearing homophobic signs and a loud speaker arrived at the festival, along with protesters in yellow vests. A group of people wearing pink masksmany of them self-described anarchistsused a large black curtain to blockthe protesters from view. Violence broke out and several people were injured.

Bergman found that while planning should have been more thorough, officers did their jobs properly when they arrived on scene. None of them stood around and watched crimes being committed, he said.

Bergman admonished Girt's post-Pride comments where he said police would have deployed differently if they were invited to the festival and allowed to have a recruitment booth.

Bergman was optimistic about the future of the relationship between HPS and the LGBTQ community. Many community members he talked to, he said, were interested in having a better relationship, and senior officers also had a "strong desire" for that.

"This report is designed to provide a blueprint for renewal," Bergman said.

Not everyone sees it that way. Lyla Miklos, an LGBTQ rights advocate, says comments during the meeting showthat the board members are committed to the status quo. No one wants to change the power centre of HPS, which according to Bergman's report, is conservative, heterosexual, white and male.

When criticized, "they get defensive. They get protective about their turf, and 'how dare you criticize me?'" she said. "There's no critical analysis happening atthat leadership table."

The apology, she says, is "a meaningless statement with no sincerity to it and no real action plan."

Cameron Kroetsch, a Pride Hamilton board member,said the whole meeting was "a terrible spectacle," also citing a report to look at a 20-per cent budget cut, largely to appease supporters of the Black Lives Matter movement. Manyboard members said they don't actually want the cuts to happen.

"It was very out of touch with what was happening in the world right now," Kroetsch said. "If you're not listening now, you're not listening ever."

Bergman's report also said HPS should sit down with Pride organizers well in advance of next year's festival. Eisenberger didn't attend the Pride festival last year, but said he's "open to going to any celebration where I'm welcome."

"One of the things that has been challenging for the last little while is that I have not been exactly welcome into the event by some organizers."

"I'm prepared to work with anyone who is prepared to sit at the table and work through issues."

The board also discusseda separate internal report today that was submitted to the Office Of Independent Police Review Director, which concludes Hamilton police followed protocol and prepared a proper operational plan.

Bergman said his report was broader in scope, and also looked at cultural issues, not just procedural ones.