Manitoba Sustainable Development "unreasonable" in freedom-of-information response failure

The provincial ombudsman saysManitoba Sustainable Developmentacted unreasonably when itfailedto respond to a freedom-of-information request about unsuccessfuleffortsto preventzebra mussels from colonizingLake Winnipeg.

In a report dated July 4, the Manitoba Ombudsman upheld a complaint againstthe provincial department formerly known Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship, which was asked to provide documents about the provincial efforts to use potash to control zebra mussels.

In 2014, the province spent $500,000 on an experiment that involved the application of liquid potash to four Manitoba harbours in an effort to kill zebra-mussel infestations.

Former NDP MLAGordMackintosh, theconservation minister at the time, initially declared what he called "operation mussel out" a success. But in 2015, provincial officials confirmed the presence of zebra mussels in both the north and south basins of Lake Winnipeg, among other bodies of water in Manitoba.

• Manitoba says zebra mussels experiment in 4 harbours worked
• Manitoba claims 1st victory against Lake Winnipeg zebra mussels
• Wind, ice hamper installation of barrier ahead of potash dump
• Manitoba hopes potash will kill zebra mussels in Lake Winnipeg harbours

In October 2015, the Winnipeg Free Press filed a freedom-of-information request seeking documents about the potash experiment, its effectiveness and its success. Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship did not initially respond.

After a complaint was made to the Manitoba Ombudsman in March 2016, Manitoba Conservation assured the ombudsman a response was coming. That response eventually arrived in May 2016, 208 days after the initial request was made and after the reporter who filed the request had moved to CBC Manitoba.

The maximum timeframe for responding to a freedom-of-information request is 30 days, according to provincial legislation.

In the report into the complaint, theombudsman's office said it sought an explanation for the lengthy delay but did not receive any from the provincial department, which was renamed Manitoba Sustainable Development by the Pallister government following its election in April.

The ombudsman's office also found no attempt was made to contact the reporter who filed the request. The ombudsmanconcluded the complaint was warranted.

"In the absence of representations from the public body which explain the failure to contact the complainant concerning his request for over three months, and the lengthy interval betweenthe requestand the eventual responseto the complainant, our officefound that Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship failed to fulfilits duty to assist the complainant," he said.

"Our office further found that the exceptional delay in responding to the complainant's access request was unreasonable."

The belated response from Manitoba Sustainable Development, which did not include most of the requested documents,yielded a separate denial-of-accesscomplaint by CBC Manitoba. That complaint remains under investigation by the ombudsman's office.