Parents' group slams EMSB's decision to use controversial new history course

A parents' group is panning the English Montreal School Board's decision to use the province's new high school history course next year, saying the curriculum shouldbe put on hold while consultations take place.

The curriculum, which is being piloted in some classrooms this year, doesnotadequately representthe experience of minorities and Aboriginal peoples, critics say.

• EXCLUSIVE:English school boards to use controversial history course next year

Andrew Ross, a founding member ofParents for a Democratic EMSB, said he was surprised the school boardopted to go ahead with the new course for Secondary III.

"We have significant problems with a program that has been acknowledged to be flawed suddenly being put into our schools, especially since these are our children that are being taught," he said in an interview.

Ross said his group wants the EMSB and other English-language school boards to "put the brakes" on the new curriculum.

Lester B. Pearson and the Eastern Townships School Board have also confirmed they will use the new curriculum.

Decision taken after 'much deliberation'

Education MinisterSbastienProulxannounced last monththat thecourse, which was originally slated to be in all Secondary III classroomsnext fall,would remain in the pilot project phase for another yearwhilechanges were made to better reflect Quebec's cultural diversity.

He later indicated the changes would only be minor and that any school wishing to use the new pilot curriculum would be permitted to do so.

The decision came as publishers announced they had already completed theirnew text books. Training dates for the new curriculum are also alreadyset for later this month.

Several English-language school boards, including the EMSB, expressed concern they would miss out on the new material and training if they didn't use the new course.

In a letter toEMSBteachers obtained by CBC News last week, SandraFurfaro, the board's director of educational and technology services, said the decision to go ahead with the new course was "taken after much deliberation."

According toFurfaro, the decision to use the new curriculum will make it easier for students to transfer from one school to another, allow for the purchase of new text books subsidized by the Education Ministry and provide teachers with opportunities for professional development.

• 'We deserve a place': Critics want minorities, First Nations featured prominently in revised history course
• Why teach history? The battle over Quebec's high school history curriculum

The new curriculum was first developed underthe previousPartiQubcoisgovernment. It was meant to replace the 2006 edition of the provincial curriculum,which faces criticisms of its own, including repetition.

The new curriculum breaks up the required history course over Secondary III and IV.