Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Login

Login

Please fill in your credentials to login.

Don't have an account? Register Sign up now.

Montreal

Ban on homegrown cannabis plants in Quebec upheld in unanimous Supreme Court ruling

On Friday, the Supreme Court of Canada sided with the province of Quebec in its ruling about the growth of cannabis plants at home.

Federal law allows people to grow up to 4 plants at home, but Quebec prohibits it

There is a marijuana plant.
A marijuana plant grown from seed during Canada's first year of cannabis legalization. (Tracy Fuller/CBC)

Quebec's ban on homegrown cannabis plants is constitutional, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled in a unanimous decision.

The ruling is in a case first brought before the courts in 2019 by Janick Murray-Hall,a Quebecer who had challenged the provincial ban successfully before Quebec's Superior Court.

The federal law allows people to grow or own up to four cannabis plants at home, but the Quebec government banned growing for personal use, with fines running between $250 and $750.

Murray-Hall's lawyer argued that Quebec's ban on owning and cultivating plants for personal use is unconstitutional and contradicts the federal cannabis law enacted in 2018.

On Friday, the Supreme Court emphatically disagreed.

According to the ruling, the provincial law meshes well with the overall goals of the federal one, which include protecting the health and security of the public and steering users away from the black market.

"The Quebec legislature saw the possession and personal cultivation of cannabis not as a social evil to be suppressed, but rather as a practice that should be prohibited in order to steer consumers to a controlled source of supply," the ruling reads.

Quebec'slaw paved the way for the creation of the Socit qubcoise du cannabis (SQDC), thegovernment agency that operatescannabisstores in the province.

The court also said that the federal law permitting the cultivation of up to four plants at home should not be interpreted as "a positive right to self-cultivation."

"It is true that, in everyday language and even in the speeches of some parliamentarians, the creation of exceptions or exemptions under a scheme of criminal offences is often described as a 'legalization effort,'" the ruling reads.

"However, this way of speaking is incorrect and falsely suggests that positive rights authorizing particular conduct have been granted to the public."

Man dressed in legal attire.
Lawyer Maxime Gurin represented appellant Janick Murray-Hall in the case. (milie Warren/CBC)

Maxime Gurin, the lawyer who represented Murray-Hall, said the ruling enshrinesthe principle that Quebec can associate cannabis with public health.

"It confirms Quebec's right to be a little independent or different in its way of approaching this question,'' Gurintold The Canadian PressFriday.

"There is certainly some disappointment, but it is the decision of the highest court, it's a constitutional decision and we don't have much choice but to rely on this.''

In a tweet, Quebec Justice Minister Simon Jolin-Barrette applauded the ruling, saying the province's cannabis law "aims to protect the health and safety of Quebecers."

"We are satisfied with the ruling of the Supreme Court that confirms Quebec's full capacity to act in this matter," Jolin-Barrette wrote.

"Quebec will always protect its jurisdiction."

Manitoba also banned growing and possessing cannabis plants for personal use.

Prior to today's ruling from the country's top court, the Quebec Superior Court sided with Murray-Hall, findingthe law to be unconstitutional. That decision was then overturned by the Quebec Court of Appeal, which set the stage for today's decision.

Ontario, Manitoba, Alberta, Saskatchewan and British Columbia were all interveners in the case.

With files from The Canadian Press