Police suffered from 'tunnel vision' when investigating Dennis Oland, defence says

Saint John police had such severe "tunnel vision" in believing Dennis Olandkilled his father, they suffered from a "psychological phenomenon" that caused them to ignore or give "short shrift" to anyevidence contrary to their theory, the defence argued during his murder retrial Wednesday.

Lawyer Alan Gold told the Saint John courtroomthe defence intends to present evidence the Olandfamily offered a rewardtwo months after Richard Olandwas killed for information leading to the arrest of his killer.

But the response of then-chief Bill Reidwas:"It would not be proper for us to issue this reward because we know Dennis did it," Gold alleged.

"We would argue that's an example of tunnel vision," he said.

Another example, according to the defence, is how police dealt with a statement from Saint John Liberal MLA Gerry Lowe about seeing someone leave the victim's office building possibly on the night he was killed.

Lowe told police he was across the street at Thandi restaurant on either July 6, 2011, or July 5, 2011, some time after 7:30 p.m., when he saw someone exit 52 Canterbury St.

Police believe Richard Oland was killed on July 6. His son was the last known person to see him alive when hevisited him at his office that night. He left around 6:30 p.m. and was captured on security video across town in Rothesayaround 7:30 p.m., shopping with his wife.

The body of the 69-year-old multimillionaire was discovered in theoffice the next morning,face down in a pool of blood. He had suffered 45 sharp- and blunt-force injuries to his head, neck and hands.

A jury found his son guilty of second-degree murder in 2015, butthe New Brunswick Court of Appeal overturned hisconviction and ordered a new trial, citing an error in the trial judge's instructions to the jury.

Retired constable Keith Copeland testified Wednesday heinterviewed Lowe on July 8but didn't attempt to clarify whether he saw someone exiting the building on July 5or July 6.

He didn't ask, for example,if Lowe had been atThandi'sboth nights, if anybody was with him, which waiters or bartenders served him, or whether he paid by credit cardall questionshe acknowledged under cross-examination by defence lawyer Michael Lacy might have helped clarify the day.

"To be honest, that didn't matter to me at the time.I was more interested in the description of the person he may have seen," Copeland said.

"Sir, isn't it obvious that if it turned out someone had witnessed someone leaving 52 Canterbury Streetafter 7:30 p.m. on July 6, 2011, that means Dennis Oland wasn't the last person to leave that address before Richard Oland was discovered dead?" asked Lacy.

"My intention was to get a description of any person he may have seen leaving 52 Canterbury Street. The confusion about which day he was there was not a concern of mine at that time," replied Copeland.

Lacy then presented the court with time-stamped security video showing Lowe entering Thandi'son July 6, 2011,at 7:40 p.m. and exiting at 8:35 p.m.

Gold saidalthough investigators believed the killer would havehad a significantamount of blood on him or her, they were able to "ignore the absence of substantial spatter" on the brown sports jacket Oland was wearing when he visited hisfather on the night he was killed.

They "suffered from what we call 'disconfirmation bias,'" he argued. "A psychologist would understand this. They already had their theory and any evidence inconsistent with the theory would receive short shrift," while evidence that supported it was "overvalued."

Gold suggestedCourt of Queen's Bench Justice Terrence Morrison will have to decide the relevance of police evidence against Oland in light of their "institutional perception."

Morrison described the argument as "novel."

Gold agreed, saying he doesn't have a "clear black and white authority" to cite.

The judge said the issue will requireits own hearing within the next few weeks andasked both sides to prepare arguments. "If nothing else, it will be interesting," he said.

It could be June before a verdict is delivered in the case, the court heard on Wednesday.

Gold advised the courthe expects the presentation of evidence to wrap up some time in March, as anticipated.

But the defencewants up to a month to prepare its written post-trial briefbefore making oral closing arguments, he said.

The judge said he suspects it will then take him "at least" a month to write his decision.

Wednesday markedDay 16 of the retrial, which started on Nov. 21 and is scheduled to last four months.

Lead Crown prosecutor P.J. Veniot raised the issue of scheduling because he has another trial slated for a week in April. The judge said the court will work around it.

On mobile?Follow our live blog of the Oland trial