Dennis Oland's defence seeks new disclosure in father's 2011 slaying

The defence has asked for new disclosure after the testimony of a retired Saint John police officer Monday at Dennis Oland's murder retrial in the death of his father more than seven years ago.

Former staff sergeant Mike King testified that on July 8, 2011 the day after Richard Oland'sbludgeoned body was discovered in his office at 52 Canterbury St. officers called him to a possible related incident at a nearby apartment building at 147GermainSt.

The glass of the back door had been broken, there was blood in the sink and they found an old, small "clawhammer" in an open garage, said King.

King, a former roofer who had observed "the holes in the top of [the victim's] head," believed a roofer's hatchet, also known as adrywall hammer, may have been used to kill him, the court heard.

The hand-held tools typically have a bevelled hammer headwith a waffle design "like a meat tenderizer"on one sideand asharp axe on the other side, he said.

The major crime unit investigated the break-in and determined it occurred after the Olandhomicide and was unrelated, said King.

But lead defence lawyer Alan Gold told the court it was the first time the defence or Crown had heard about the incident and pointed out King didn't know how investigators made that determination.

Kingcould not say, for example, how soon after the homicide it occurred or whether they tested the blood to see if it matched Oland's, said Gold.

Dennis Oland, 50, who is the lastperson known to have seen his multimillionaire father alive when he visited him at his office on the evening of July 6, 2011,is being retried for second-degree murder in his death.

The body of the69-year-old was found in the office the next morning, face down in a pool of blood. Hehad suffered 45 sharp- and blunt-force injuries to his head, neck and hands.

A jury found his son guilty in 2015, but the New Brunswick Court of Appeal overturned his conviction and ordered a new trial, citing an error in the trial judge's instructions to the jury.

The trial resumed Monday in Saint John's Court of Queen's Bench after a three-week holiday break.

King broke down on the standtestifying again about his allegation that retired deputy chief Glen McCloskey had encouraged him not to reveal McCloskeyhad entered the bloody crime scene.

King first made the allegation during Oland'sfirst trial. McCloskeydenied the allegation, telling the court he had entered the office twice that dayfirst to observe the bodyand then again out of "curiosity."

During a news conference last month, McCloskeyreiterated it would have been "illogical" to suggest King alter his testimony becauseCrown prosecutors and former police chief Bill Reid knew he was in the crime scene.

On Monday, King repeated thatin 2014, before he was scheduled to testify at Oland's preliminary inquiry, McCloskey told him he he didn't have to tell anyone that he, McCloskey,had been in the office.

At the time, McCloskeywas King'simmediate supervisor as the divisional inspector in charge of patrol.

Gold asked King on Monday whether it was easy to come forward with the allegation. King doubled over, holding both sides of his head. "No," he replied through tears. Asked whether he enjoyed doing it, King said, "No, I didn't."

McCloskey is expected to testify at the retrial, possibly later this week.

'This isn't what we thought'

Earlier in the day, Const. Anthony Gilbert testified that if he had known he was responding to a homicide or even a suspicious death, he might have worn protective gear beforeenteringthe bloodyoffice,or possiblynot entered at all.

But the sergeant who dispatched him and Const. Stephen Davidson did not provide any such information, and neither did the first responding officers who greeted them at the scene, said Gilbert.

"We were under the impression it was a heart attack," or some other kind of natural death, he said, noting the 911 call had come in as a man "not conscious, not breathing."

Once he saw the pool of blood around the victim's head, however, he said he quickly realized it was a possible crime scene.

Gilbert told the court he turned to Davidson and said, "'This isn't what we thought,' or 'This isn't what we expected,' or something along those lines."

Theyexited the office, retracing their steps without touching anything, he said.

Gilbert, a member of the major crime unit, testifiedhe only went about 10 steps into the victim's office and estimated he and Davidson were only in there for about 30 seconds.

He called his supervisor as soon as theyexited to advise himthe death "appeared to be suspicious in nature," he said.

The retrial, which began in November, hasheard from several police officers, including Davidson, who went on to becomethe lead investigator, andthe head of the forensic identification section.

The retrial is scheduled to last four months.

Follow our live blog here: