Moncton council postpones vote on changes to binding arbitration rules

Moncton city council has postponedthe debate over a resolution seeking changes to binding arbitrationin the province's industrial relations act for firefighters and police.

A special council meeting was held Tuesday to discuss a resolution proposed in a letter from the Cities of New Brunswick Association.

Chair Adam Lordonsent the letter Nov. 5 asking the eight city councils across the province to vote on the same proposal on Nov. 12.

All eight cities, with the exception of Saint John, had it on Tuesday's agenda. Saint John will discuss the proposed resolution Nov. 18.

The association had previously said in June that it wanted the Industrial Relations Act amended by the province to force arbitration boardsto consider a municipality's ability to pay when dealing with fire and police contracts.

Municipal police and fire service unions are barred from striking in the province. When negotiations fail, arbitration is used to reach a new collective agreement.

The province said it would consider making changes to the act if there was enough support from municipalities.

Union advised of process

While Moncton only has a firefighting service, other cities across the province have both essential services to consider.

After reviewing a report prepared by city staff and hearing fromcity manager Marc Landry, some city councillorsasked howthe firefighter's union had responded to theproposed change.Landrydidn't go into detail butsaid the union had been advised the process was underway.

Landry said the resolution would look at specific criteria including the economic health of the province and municipality, andthe employer's ability to pay.

"It's really taking those items into consideration, which is not currently included in that Industrial Relations Act," Landry said.

He saidsimilar legislation was recentlypassed in Ontario and proved beneficial in awards fromarbitration.

However, Coun. Bryan Butler said he wouldn'tsupport the resolution because when similar changeswere previously considered, the unions had raised serious concerns.

Others deny support

Coun. Paul Pellerinadded that it was a "bit much" to say that binding arbitration posed a financial risk to the city, as he listed the city's expenditures on the subway, subsidy for the Moncton Magic, UFC bid fee and more.

"We've always had those," he said referring to the financial risk. "The plan this week is to reduce our capital works budget by $5 million a year and now I hate to say it but we're all crying wolf."

Pellerin said the city should not be finding ways to get other people to pay for the city's financial decisions.

Coun. Brian Hicks askedhow an arbitrator would decide on an award based in part ontheability to pay, considering thestrength of Moncton's economy and how the city has found funding for the things it wants.

"I'm not sure we've thought this through," said Hicks, adding that he wouldn't support the motion.

Coun. Charles Lgersaid this shouldn't be viewed as as an attack on firefighters but as a way to have an open discussion.

"I think what it is is there will be differences in what other municipalities can and cannot pay but I think it's really about fairly looking at this."

Lgersaid the resolution needed futher consideration and made themotion to table the discussion.

"Maybe there needs to be more details, maybe the general public needs to understand this a little better."