Mi'kmaq chiefs reject any ban on Indigenous fishing in marine protected areas

Nova Scotia Mi'kmaq chiefs say Indigenous fishermen should be exemptfrom any prohibition on fishing within marine protected areas because ofFirst Nations' treaty rights.

"Our concerns and our input should have a greater weight in the decision making process than those of, for example, non-Mi'kmaw commercial fishers," saidTwila Gaudet, director of consultation for the Assembly of Nova Scotia Mi'kmaq Chiefs.

That statement was part of a submission made to a federal advisory panel charged with developing standards for marine protected areas. The Trudeau government has committedto protect 10 per cent of coastal waters and oceans by 2020.

The advisory panel is supposed to release its recommendations this month on what activities should and should not be allowed inside the protected areas.

The key issue isno-take zones where fishing andoffshore energy development would be prohibited.

In their submission, the Mi'kmaqchiefs say First Nations have demonstrated their commitment to conservation but their rights to fish for a moderate living and their food, social and ceremonial fishery supersedeany international commitments.

"To be clear, DFO should not impose restrictions or limitations on what the Mi'kmaq of Nova Scotia can harvest in MPAs," Gaudet said.

The question of no-take zones has come to dominate the debate over the province's Eastern Shore Islands.

The sprawling and pristine archipelago east of Halifax is the first proposed marine protected areawith an active inshore lobster fishery.

There is a fear among those that fish in the area that a no-take zone designationcould bump them from lobster grounds.

Last week, alocal advisory committee held a public consultation at a local legionto discuss activities in the marine area.

The Department of Fisheries and Oceans "does not expect there to be an impact on the lobster fishery" if theEastern Shore Islands are designated as marine protected area, DFO ocean managerWendy Williams said during a break.

That didn't satisfy fisherman Peter Connors,who also represents 170 lobster licence holders in the area through theEastern Shore Fishermen's Protective Association.

"Nobody will say it's not going to have some kind of impact.They are going to try and minimize the impact. The words are crafted so there is room to manoeuvrethere," he said.

'A big issue'

"No take is a big issue because itwould be so dislocating. We have a territorial fishery. Some of the disputes that have taken place over the years,we all have a certain amount of territory here that we all respect, for the most part."

He wants a commitment from the federal government to prevent the fishery from being damaged if the area received a marine protected designation.

Long-time environmental activist Susanna Fuller agrees.

"We probably need to take that off the table as the initial starting point," she said."Confirm that recreational fisheries can still happen, confirm that the lobster fishery will be maintained."

With thelobster fishery runningjust two months of the year, even if no-take zones are best practices, this isn't the hill to die on, she said.

'We probably have to go back to ground zero'

"If we want this process to lead to an MPA, we probably have to go back to ground zero and start again, andthink about the objectives of the entire community and how do we get there," Fuller said.

"And the no take seems to be a real sticking point even if it's not goingto impact most of the users. If it's a hot potato, get rid of the hot potato. That is my advice."

Live-lobster exporter Stewart Lamontdoes not buy what he calls the "myth" that the lobster fishery will be threatened by marine protection.

He saidDFO knows it is a fundamental part of the economy in the area and has a low impact on marine life in the Eastern Shore area.

The designationis a chance to promote the Eastern Shore, already featured in aNova Scotia Nature Trustcampaign to protect "100 Wild Islands" located in theproposed marine protected area.

"I can imagine what it could be here in the Eastern Shore. This is, as we say, an under-performing region in Nova Scotia," Lamont said.

"It has all the potential in the world coupled with 100 Wild Islands, coupled with experiential tourism, coupled with the greater value of and the wonderful biomass here in our wild fisheries. It'sall part of a piece that we can use as a platform for economic sustainability."

The Mi'kmaq submission to the panel does not surpriseConnors.

"Our association has always supported reconciliation. Our position is for a single fishery including the Mi'kmaq and bringing them into the commercial fishery, on the same basis that everybody else does here," he said.

In a statement to CBC News, Twila Gaudet said the Mi'kmaq are currently in consultations withDFO on marine protected areas.

"While we of course support marine conservation, we also want to ensure that DFO carefully considers all impacts that MPA designations will have on Mi'kmaq rights," she said.

"The MPA network design must accommodate the Aboriginal and treaty rights of the Mi'kmaq of Nova Scotia, and our ability to fish for a moderate livelihood, as well as other Mi'kmaq fishing activities."

Read more articles from CBCNova Scotia