Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Login

Login

Please fill in your credentials to login.

Don't have an account? Register Sign up now.

Posted: 2017-01-09T16:41:26Z | Updated: 2017-01-09T16:42:23Z

On Capitol Hill this week, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold confirmation hearings to consider the first of Donald Trump s cabinet nominations, Sen. Jefferson B. Sessions of Alabama. 26 years ago, this same committee denied Sessions a recommendation for the federal bench. Most of Reagans judicial appointments have been people with impressive credentials regardless of their ideologies, the editors of the LA Times wrote. Sessions is a different story.

The Senate refused to confirm Sessions in 1986 because the testimony they heard suggested that he sided with his namesake, Jefferson Davis, over Americas commitment to equal protection under the law.

A quarter century later, the Senate must decide if Sessions has changed.

Senator Sessions record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

If the photo of Senator Sessions greeting Donald Trumps thank you tour in Mobile, Alabama, alongside Southern belles in hoop skirts isnt enough to make clear what past greatness his support of Trump hearkens back to, then the nation should listen to the question of one civil rights veteran from Alabama who asked, in the language of Scripture, Can a leopard change his spots?

Senator Sessions record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantee citizenship, equal protection under the law, and the ballot to all Americans.

Indeed. The record is clear. Here are eight reasons why the Senate must reject Sessions.

If Jefferson B. Sessions were confirmed by the Senate in 2017, we would have have an attorney general who, as a senator:

  1. Applauded the Supreme Courts 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision, which gutted key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1865.
  2. Voted against reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act.
  3. Voted yes on a constitutional ban of same-sex marriage.
  4. Opposed the repeal of dont ask, dont tell.
  5. Opposed the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.
  6. Voted to ease restrictions on wiretapping of cell-phones.
  7. Voted to abolish a program that helps businesses owned by women and minorities compete for federally funded transportation projects.
  8. Opposed comprehensive immigration reform and nearly every immigration bill that has come before the Senate over the past two decades, including voting against a Senate resolution affirming that the United States must not bar people from the country because of their religion.

The positions and policies Senator Sessions has supported do not uplift Americas shared values of love, justice and mercy.

Like George Wallace before him, Jeff Sessions is a faithful member of the United Methodist Church in Alabama. But he has not in half a century of public life demonstrated any willingness to turn from evil and learn to do good.

The positions and policies Senator Sessions has supported do not uplift Americas shared values of love, justice and mercy, despite his trappings of respectability and declarations of faith. He has neither repented of his wrongdoing nor committed to change. So we must reject his nomination and the nomination of any candidate for Attorney General who poses a threat to equal justice and the freedoms we hold dear.

When those who wield the power of the state deprive the people of these freedoms, citizens in general and the U.S. Department of Justice in particular must resist their injustice and hold them accountable. Senator Sessions is clearly unfit for the role of Attorney General.

Support Free Journalism

Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

Support HuffPost