Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Sign Up

Sign Up

Please fill this form to create an account.

Already have an account? Login here.

Posted: 2019-05-31T21:04:54Z | Updated: 2019-05-31T21:04:54Z

SOMEWHERE ON US-218 BETWEEN MOUNT PLEASANT AND KEOKUK, Iowa New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker , a candidate for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, said in a interview with HuffPost that hes open to proposals to reform a Supreme Court dominated by conservatives, but thinks adding more seats to the court will only result in an unproductive arms race with Republicans.

Democrats are debating whether they should add seats to the Supreme Court in an effort to create a liberal majority among the justices after the infamous GOP blockade of President Barack Obamas nomination of Merrick Garland in 2016 and the contested confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh in 2018. Booker, who is typically cautious on procedural matters, said the party should look at other ways to change the court and hopes it can be a moderating force in American politics.

I am open to us finding a way to stop the extremist tilt of the Supreme Court, and Ive seen a number of different models and possibilities about how to reorganize the Supreme Court, from term limits to rotating people on the court, Booker said in an interview aboard his campaign RV in Iowa. Im open to everything.

But Booker said he also doesnt want to create a race to the bottom between the two major American political parties.

Support Free Journalism

Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

Support HuffPost

If Democrats add people when we have an alignment of power, and thats the totality of our reforms, then its clear that Republicans are going to try to do that as well, he said. And one day our grandchildren will ask us: Hey, Granddad, why are there 121 people on the Supreme Court?

We should be very thoughtful about this and try to bring back that kind of moderating force the judiciary has always had, he said.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), another contender for the 2020 Democratic nomination, has staked out a similar position. South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg has suggested increasing the size of the court to 15 justices, but also requiring at least five of the justices to have the approval of the first 10. Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) has said shes open to adding more seats to the court.

Support Free Journalism

Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

Support HuffPost

While there is a long-standing precedent of placing nine justices on the Supreme Court, the actual number is not laid out in the Constitution. Some Democrats have begun to argue the Republican blockade of Garlands nomination amounted to the GOP changing the number of justices on the court unilaterally for a year.

Support Free Journalism

Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

Support HuffPost