Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Login

Login

Please fill in your credentials to login.

Don't have an account? Register Sign up now.

Posted: 2024-09-10T19:20:33Z | Updated: 2024-09-10T19:20:33Z

Justice Elena Kagan thinks the Supreme Court s conservative majority may not stop at abortion rights, she told a crowd at the New York University School of Law on Monday, warning that the logic used to overturn Roe v. Wade could be broadly applied elsewhere.

I dont think youre overreading the bigger question, Kagan said in a conversation with Melissa Murray, a law professor and podcast host whod asked about the implications of Roes reversal, according to The New York Times .

With its landmark 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization, the high court dismantled the right to abortion based on the argument that it is not deeply rooted in this Nations history and tradition, as Justice Samuel Alito wrote at the time.

Thats the entirety of the majoritys reasoning, Kagan said.

If you extend that argument elsewhere, said Kagan, its possible to strike down what would otherwise be firm constitutional protections.

Then you say the same thing for contraception, she warned. Then you can say the same thing for interracial marriage. Then you could say the same thing for gay marriage.

Kagan also addressed the ongoing ethics scandal thats embroiled the court, with bombshell stories about Alito and Clarence Thomas, another conservative justice, accepting lavish gifts from Republican billionaires like Paul Singer , whos repeatedly had business before the court.

Kagan has been a leading voice for an enforceable code of ethics at the Supreme Court, despite pushback from the right.

Support Free Journalism

Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

Support HuffPost

It seems like a good idea in terms of ensuring that we comply with our own code of conduct going forward in the future, she said at the NYU School of Law. It seems like a good idea in terms of ensuring that people have confidence that were doing exactly that. So it seems like a salutary thing for the court.

Last week, ProPublica reported that Thomas wife has privately lauded efforts to oppose court reform, with Ginni Thomas praising a group run by conservative activist Kelly Shackelford, who called Kagans ethics push treasonous and disloyal.

Kagan on Monday declined to address Shackelfords treasonous comment, telling the NYU School of Law crowd that she didnt want to dignify it any further.

Support Free Journalism

Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

Support HuffPost